<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2460-0245</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JIMS</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2460-0245</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2086-8952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>IndoMS</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Indonesia</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22342/jims.v32i3.2325</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Mathematics Subject Classification</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>An Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for a Stochastic Differential Equations with \psi-Caputo Fractional Derivative</article-title><subtitle>Eksistensi dan Ketunggalan Solusi untuk Persamaan Diferensial Stokastik dengan Turunan Fraksional ψ-Caputo</subtitle></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hariharan</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><address><country country="IN">India</country><email>hari.r2412@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Udhayakumar</surname><given-names>Ramalingam</given-names></name><address><country country="IN">India</country><email>udhayaram_v@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Wijaya</surname><given-names>Kristiana</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>kristiana.fmipa@unej.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Mathematics</institution><country>Vellore Institute of Technology</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1"><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Jember</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/049f0ha78</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><author-notes><fn fn-type="coi-statement"><label>Conflict of interest</label><p>The authors declare no Conflict of interest.</p></fn><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: Ramalingam Udhayakumar. Email: <email>udhayaram_v@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-09-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-09-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title>SEPTEMBER</issue-title><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><elocation-id>34A08, 60H10, 34A12</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-12-04"><day>04</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-03-05"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jims-a.org/index.php/jimsa/article/view/2325" xlink:title="2325"></self-uri><abstract><p>The present work investigates the existence and uniqueness of solutions for a fractional stochastic differential equations with <italic>ψ</italic>-Caputo fractional derivatives. We establish important theoretical conclusion and examine the energy growth bounds and asymptotic behavior of the stochastic solution using the Banach's fixed point theorem. Additionally, we consider our analysis into single-valued function derived from multivalued mappings. We provide examples to validate in our methodology.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>$\psi$-Caputo fractional stochastic differential equation</kwd><kwd>Single valued map</kwd><kwd>Energy-growth bound</kwd><kwd>Asymptotic behavior</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement>This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value>https://jatseditor.com</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec-1"><title>1. INTRODUCTION</title><p>Fractional calculus extends standard diferentiation and integration to noninteger orders, which creates a wider mathematical framework. This enables for the simulation of process with memory and mutations, which are common in many science and engineering systems. Additional studies support both the theory and applications of fractional calculus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">[1]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">[2]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">[3]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">[4]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">[5]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">[6]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">[7]</xref>. It remains an efective framework for understanding and solving complex problems. Fractional derivatives such as Caputo fractional derivative, Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative and <italic>ψ</italic>-Fractional derivatives have specific benefits for modeling complex operations.</p><p>Almeida <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">[8]</xref> expanded the standard definition for Caputo fractional derivatives by introducing a flexible formulation that includes more general integral operators and diferent types of kernels. The <italic>ψ</italic>-Caputo derivatives enriches a function <italic>ψ</italic>(t), resulting in more flexibility in modeling complex systems with variable scaling attributes (refer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">[9]</xref>. The <italic>ψ</italic>-Caputo derivative uses a kernel function <italic>ψ</italic> to model diferent systems behaviors, making it a useful tool for describing complex phenomena. Sharma et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">[10]</xref> discussed the existence and controllability results for fractional integro-diferential stochastic delayed system with impulsive efects. A function that may generate numerous outputs from the single input is known as the multi-valued function. A single-valued function is the specific case of the multivalued function. It is defined that there is exactly one output for every input. A single-valued function is a part multi-valued functions that it has a single element in their output set.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">[11]</xref>, Hariharan et al. investigated the existence and uniqueness of Hilfer-Kkatugampola fractional diferential equations with almost sectorial operators. Zhou and Zhang in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">[12]</xref> combined the probability density function and the Laplace transform to construct a framework of moderate solutions. Moreover, Peng and Jia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">[14]</xref> investigated the existence and uniqueness of the solutions for fractional diferential equation whose derivative has an impact on an arbitrary function. In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">[15]</xref> Yang discussed the existence uniqueness of mild solution for a class of <italic>ψ</italic>-Caputo fractional stochastic evolution equation with varying-time delay driven by fractional Brownian motion. In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">[16]</xref>, authors investigated on <italic>ψ</italic>-fractional stochastic system with Rosenblatt process. In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">[17]</xref>, authors were studied long term behaviours of the mild solution to a Hilfer time-fractional stochastic diferential equation. Sharma et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">[18]</xref> investigated the existence of the mild solution and approximate controllability of a class of Caputo conformable fractional neutral-type stochastic system with the instantaneous impulsive efects and nonlocal conditions.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">[19]</xref>, Sharma et al. discussed the existence and controllability results for fractional Sobolev-type stochastic system involving delays and impulses. El-Sayed and Ibrahim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">[20]</xref> demonstrated the Cauchy problem of the multi-valued fractional diferential equation. Nandhaprasadh and Udhayakumar <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">[21]</xref> examined the existence of mild solutions for fractional stochastic evolution equations with infinite delay on an infinite interval. Hammami and Horrigue <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">[22]</xref> investigated the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the <italic>ψ</italic>-Riemann-Liouville fractional stochastic diferential equation is determined using Banach’s fixed point theorem. Omaba et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">[23]</xref> used Banach fixed point theorem to prove existence and uniqueness of mild solution.</p><p>Motivated by the above articles, the following system is investigated by the fractional stochastic diferential inclusion expressed in the Caputo sense in the presence of stochastic noise,</p><disp-formula id="equation-1"><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left\{ \begin{array}{l} ^ {C} D _ {\psi} ^ {\gamma} U (t) \in g [ t, U (t) ] d t + \sum_ {i = 1} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} [ t, U (t) ] d W _ {i} (t) + F (t, U (t)), \\ U (0) = u _ {0}, \end{array} \right.\tag{1} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>here we take <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-2"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f ( t , U ( t ) ) \in F ( t , U ( t ) ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a single valued function. Then the above inclusion, we consider the equation defined by</p><disp-formula id="equation-2"><tex-math id="math-3"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left\{ \begin{array}{l} ^ {C} D _ {\psi} ^ {\gamma} U (t) = g [ t, U (t) ] d t + \sum_ {i = 1} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} [ t, U (t) ] d W _ {i} (t) + f (t, U (t)), \\ U (0) = u _ {0}, \end{array} \right.\tag{2} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-4"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t \in [ 0 , \vartheta ] , \ 0 < \gamma < 1 , \ g : [ 0 , \vartheta ] \times \mathbb { R } \to \mathbb { R } , \ \rho : [ 0 , \vartheta ] \times \mathbb { R } \to \mathbb { R } ^ { m } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the two well-defined maps, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-5"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle F : [ 0 , \vartheta ] \times \mathbb { B } \to 2 ^ { \mathbb { B } } - \{ \tau \} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a set valued and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-6"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f : [ 0 , \vartheta ] \times \mathbb { B } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> B is a single valued map and B is a Banach space.</p><p>The main contribution of this work is constructing and analysing the generalized fractional-order system with the <italic>ψ</italic>-Caputo derivative. Using single-valued nonlinear functions and Banach’s fixed point theorem, we proved the existence and uniqueness of the solutions. Along with the asymptotic behavior of these solutions, we are verified their stability under the suitable conditions. An energy growth bound was derived to characterize the boundedness of the system. An example is presented to illustrate the significance of the existence and uniqueness results.</p><p>This work is organized as follows: Section 2 to recalls some fundamental concepts, results and properties related to fractional calculus and stochastic diferential equations. Section 3 constructs the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the non-linear stochastic <italic>ψ</italic>-Caputo fractional diferential equation. Section 4 demonstrates the upper growth bound. Section 5 establishes an exponential growth bound on the energy solution at time <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-7"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t \in [ 0 , \vartheta ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Finally, Section 6 provides an example for verifying our methodology.</p></sec><sec id="sec-2"><title>2. PRELIMINARIES</title><p>In this section, we provide some basic concepts of stochastic diferential equations and <italic>ψ</italic>−fractional operator. Let us take <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-8"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \boldsymbol { P } = [ 0 , \vartheta ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-9"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 0 < \gamma < 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , 0 &lt; <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-10"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \delta < 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and let <italic>ψ</italic> be a non−negative function on P that is continuous and whose derivative <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-11"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \psi ^ { ' } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is also non−negative. Simply, a given <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-12"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \boldsymbol \rho \in { \cal P } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , we represent the function <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-13"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \psi _ { p } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> defined by</p><disp-formula id="equation-3"><tex-math id="math-14"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \psi_ {p} (t) = \psi (t) - \psi (p), \quad \forall t \in P. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><bold>Definition 2.1.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">[24]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">[25]</xref><italic>The ψ-Caputo fractional derivative of the function </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-15"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f \in \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic></italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-16"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle C ^ { n } ( P , \mathbb { R } ) , \gamma > 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , then the order γ is defined by</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-4"><tex-math id="math-17"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle { } ^ { C } D ^ { \gamma , \psi } ( f ) ( t ) = I _ { \psi } ^ { n - \gamma , \psi } \vartheta _ { x } ^ { n } f ( x ) .\tag{3} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-18"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { \psi \vartheta _ { x } = \big ( \frac { 1 } { \psi ^ { \prime } ( x ) } \frac { d } { d x } \big ) } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-19"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle n = [ \gamma ] + 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p>by</p><p>The fractional integral of the function f with respect to a function <italic>ψ</italic> is defined</p><disp-formula id="equation-5"><tex-math id="math-20"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle I ^ {\gamma , \psi} f (x) = \frac {1}{\Gamma (\gamma)} \int_ {0} ^ {x} \psi^ {\prime} (t) \psi_ {0} ^ {\gamma - 1} (x) f (t) d t,\tag{4} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>provided the integral exists.</p><p><bold>Lemma 2.2.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">[26]</xref><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-21"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 0 < p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-22"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \gamma > p , f \in C \gamma , \psi [ P , \mathbb { R } ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , then we have,</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-6"><tex-math id="math-23"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle { } ^ { C } D ^ { p , \psi } I ^ { \gamma , \psi } = I ^ { \gamma - 1 , \psi } f ( t ) , \quad \forall t \in P .\tag{5} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>In particular, any non-negative integer </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-24"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle n \leq [ \gamma ] + 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> 4</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-7"><tex-math id="math-25"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle D ^ {n} I ^ {\gamma , \psi} f (t) = I ^ {\gamma - n, \psi} f (t), \quad \forall t \in P.\tag{6} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><bold>Lemma 2.3.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">[27]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">[28]</xref><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-26"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle I f \gamma > 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-27"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \delta > 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , then we obtain</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-8"><tex-math id="math-28"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 1. I ^ {\gamma , \psi} \left(\psi_ {0} ^ {\delta - 1}\right) = \frac {\Gamma (\delta)}{\Gamma (\delta + \gamma)} \psi_ {0} ^ {\delta + \gamma - 1}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><disp-formula id="equation-9"><tex-math id="math-29"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2. ^ {C} D ^ {\gamma , \psi} \left(\psi_ {0} ^ {\delta - 1}\right) = \frac {\Gamma (\delta)}{\Gamma (\delta - \gamma)} \psi_ {0} ^ {\delta - \gamma - 1}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><target id="anchor-1" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Lemma 2.4.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">[29]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">[30]</xref><italic>If </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-30"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 0 < \gamma < 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-31"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f \in C ^ { n } [ P , \mathbb { R } ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , then we obtain</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-10"><tex-math id="math-32"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle I ^ {\gamma , \psi} \left(^ {c} D ^ {\gamma , \psi} f\right) (t) = f (t) - \sum_ {n = 0} ^ {r - 1} \frac {f ^ {(n)} \left(a ^ {+}\right)}{n !} \left(\psi_ {0} (t)\right) ^ {n}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>In particular for </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-33"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \gamma \in ( 0 , 1 ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , we get</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-11"><tex-math id="math-34"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle I ^ {\gamma , \psi} \left(^ {C} D ^ {\gamma , \psi} f\right) (t) = f (t) - f (0), \quad \forall t \in P.\tag{7} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><bold>Definition 2.5.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">[31]</xref><italic>A one dimensional Brownian motion </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-35"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \{ W ( t ) , \mathbb { R } ^ { + } \mathbb { R } \} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is a real valued stochastic process that satisfies:</italic></p><p><italic>I. </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-36"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle W ( 0 ) = 0 . \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p><italic>II. Independent increment: When </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-37"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle q \leq t \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , the increments </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-38"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle W ( t ) - W ( q ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-39"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle W ( t - q ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> are independent.</italic></p><p><italic>III. Normal increment : The diference </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-40"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle W ( q + t ) - W ( q ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> follows a normal distribution </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-41"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle O ( 0 , t ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> for all </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-42"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle q , t \geq 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-43"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle { \mathcal { O } } ( \lambda , \sigma ^ { 2 } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> denotes a normal distribution with the mean λ and the variance </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-44"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \sigma ^ { 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p><italic>IV. Brownian motion has almost continuous, then the function </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-45"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t W ( t ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is continuous.</italic></p><p><bold>Lemma 2.6.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">[22]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">[31]</xref> (Ito isometryb ) <italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-46"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle H : P \times \Lambda \to \mathbb { R } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be a stochastic process(means that </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-47"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \dot { F } _ { t } ^ { W } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> - measurable for each </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-48"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t \in P ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , we have</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-12"><tex-math id="math-49"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {E} \left[ \left(\int_ {0} ^ {\vartheta} X _ {t} d W _ {t}\right) ^ {2} \right] = \mathbb {E} \left[ \int_ {0} ^ {\vartheta} X _ {t} ^ {2} d t \right].\tag{8} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><bold>Definition 2.7</bold>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">[22]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">[31]</xref><italic>We delegate a group of square-integrable functions on Λ to </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-50"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle H ( \Lambda ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , with the following norm defined as</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-13"><tex-math id="math-51"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \| x \| _ {H} ^ {2} = \int_ {\Lambda} \mathbb {E} | x (z) | ^ {2} d z.\tag{9} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><target id="anchor-2" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 2.8.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">[32]</xref> (Banach’s Fixed Point Theorem) <italic>Let T be a complete metric space and let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-52"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle M : T T \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be a contraction on T. Then M has unique fixed point </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-53"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle y \in T \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> such that </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-54"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \boldsymbol { M } ( \boldsymbol { y } ^ { * } ) = \boldsymbol { y } ^ { * } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p><bold>Lemma 2.9.</bold><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">[33]</xref> (Gronwall Inequality) <italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-55"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K > 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-56"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle x , y : P \to [ 0 , \infty ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be two continuous function satisfies</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-14"><tex-math id="math-57"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle y (t) \leq K + \int_ {0} ^ {t} x (z) y (z) d z, \quad t \in P. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Then, the regular Gronwall inequality is given by,</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-15"><tex-math id="math-58"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle y (z) \leq K \exp \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} y (z) d z\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula></sec><sec id="sec-3"><title>3. MAIN RESULT</title><p>Around this article, referring the filtered probability space which satisfies the standard requirements and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-59"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle M = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , \cdots , m \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-60"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( \Lambda , \eta , \eta _ { t } , \mathbb { P } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Then the following notations must be used.</p><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-61"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \bullet W (t) = \left( W _ {1} (t) W _ {2} (t) \vdots W _ {m} (t) \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a m - dimensional Brownian motion.</p><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-62"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle g : P \times \mathbb { R } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> R and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-63"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho ^ { i } : P \times \mathbb { R } \to \mathbb { R } ^ { m } , f o r \ i \in M , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are well-defined maps.</p><p>For easier use, to indicate the components of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-64"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> throughout the text using the superscript <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-65"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho _ { j } ^ { i } , i , j \in M \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . The following stochastic diferential equation is taken into consideration.</p><disp-formula id="equation-16"><tex-math id="math-66"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left\{ \begin{array}{l} ^ {C} D _ {\psi} ^ {\gamma} U (t) = g [ t, U (t) ] d t + \sum_ {i = 1} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} [ t, U (t) ] d W _ {i} (t) + f (t, U (t)), \\ U (0) = u _ {0}. \end{array} \right. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-67"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t \in P , 0 < \gamma < 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Using the Lemma (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-1">2.4</xref>), the problem can change in its equivalent integral form:</p><disp-formula id="equation-17"><tex-math id="math-68"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{c} U (t) = u _ {0} + \frac {1}{\Gamma (\gamma)} \int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi_ {0} ^ {\gamma - 1} (z) \psi^ {\prime} (z) \bigg [ g (z, U (z)) d z + \sum_ {i = 1} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} (z, U (z)) d W _ {i} (z) \\ + f (z, U (z)) \bigg ] d z. \end{array}\tag{10} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The existence and uniqueness of solutions to the nonlinear stochastic <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-69"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \psi - \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> Caputo fractional diferential equation will be demonstrated in this section. For this, we assume that all <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-70"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \tau \in g \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-71"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho _ { j } ^ { i } , ( t , u ) \in P \times \mathbb { R } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-72"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle i , j \in M \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p>(1) Lipschitz continuity: For any <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-73"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t \in [ 0 , \vartheta ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-74"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \in \mathbb { R } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , there exist a positive constant J, we have</p><disp-formula id="equation-18"><tex-math id="math-75"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \psi^ {\prime} (t) | \tau (t, u) - \tau (t, v) | ^ {2} \leq J (| u - v | ^ {2}).\tag{11} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>(2) Linear growth: For any <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-76"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t \in [ 0 , \vartheta ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-77"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \in \mathbb { R } . \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , there exist a positive constant G, we have</p><disp-formula id="equation-19"><tex-math id="math-78"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \psi^ {\prime} (t) | \tau (t, u) | ^ {2} \leq G (1 + | u | ^ {2}).\tag{12} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Define an operator A : <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-79"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle H ( \Lambda ) \to H ( \Lambda ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> by:</p><disp-formula id="equation-20"><tex-math id="math-80"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} A (U (t)) = u _ {0} + \frac {1}{\Gamma (\gamma)} \int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi_ {0} ^ {\gamma - 1} (z) \psi^ {\prime} (z) \left[ g (z, U (z)) d z + \sum_ {i = 1} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} (z, U (z)) d W _ {i} (z) \right. \\ \left. + f (z, U (z)) \right] d z. \end{array}\tag{13} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>To prove the solutions of the existence and uniqueness, we first prove the following lemma.<target id="anchor-3" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Lemma 3.1.</bold> Let U and V be the random field solutions, which satisfies</p><disp-formula id="equation-21"><tex-math id="math-81"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {E} \| A (U) - A (V) \| ^ {2} \leq \frac {3 (m ^ {2} + 2) H \psi^ {2 \gamma - 1} (\vartheta)}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \| U - V \| ^ {2}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. By using the conditions such that, algebraic inequality <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-82"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left( \sum _ { i = 1 } ^ { q } r _ { i } \right) ^ { 2 } \leq \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-83"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \textstyle q \sum _ { i = 1 } ^ { q } r _ { i } ^ { 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , the Itob isometry, the Lipschitz continuity and the linear growth we get the following evaluation</p><disp-formula id="equation-22"><tex-math id="math-84"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) - A (V (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq \frac {3 \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t)}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma (\gamma)} \\ \qquad \left[ \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi^ {\prime} (z) \Big | g (z, U (z)) - g (z, V (z)) \Big | ^ {2} d z\right) \right. \\ \qquad + \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi^ {\prime} (z) \Big | \sum_ {i = 1} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} (z, U (z)) - \sum_ {i = 1} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} (z, V (z)) \Big | ^ {2} d W _ {i} (z)\right) \\ \qquad + \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi^ {\prime} (z) \Big | f (z, U (z)) - f (z, V (z)) \Big | ^ {2} d z\right) \Bigg ] \\ \qquad \leq \frac {3 H \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t)}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} [ 2 + m ^ {2} ] \int_ {0} ^ {t} \mathbb {E} (| U (z) - V (z) | ^ {2}) d z \\ \qquad \leq \frac {3 (m ^ {2} + 1) H \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (\vartheta)}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \| U - V \| ^ {2}. \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>This completes the <italic>proof</italic>.</p><p>The <italic>proof</italic> of the following theorem is completed by applying Theorem (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-2">2.8</xref>) together with the lemma (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-3">3.1</xref>).</p><p><bold>Theorem</bold><bold>3.2.</bold><italic>Given L be a constant in inequality</italic><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-18">(11)</xref><italic>which satisfies</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-23"><tex-math id="math-85"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle L < \frac {3 (2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)}{\psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (\vartheta) (m ^ {2} + 2)}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Thus, the equation <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-24">(14)</xref> has unique solution.</p></sec><sec id="sec-4"><title>4. ENERGY GROWTH-BOUND</title><p>The upper growth moment bound was proved in this section. It is essential to demonstrate the succeeding lemma.<target id="anchor-4" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Lemma 4.1.</bold><italic>Suppose that U is the random field solution which resolves the problem and fulfills</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-24"><tex-math id="math-86"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \sup _ {t \in P} \mathbb {E} | U (z) | < \infty .\tag{14} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Given that the Linear growth</italic><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-19">(12)</xref><italic>holds, we obtain:</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-25"><tex-math id="math-87"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq c _ {2} + 2 c _ {1} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {\vartheta} \mathbb {E} | U (z) | ^ {2} d z\right), \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><disp-formula id="equation-26"><tex-math id="math-88"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle whe r e, c _ {0} = 4 \mathbb {E} (u _ {0} ^ {2}) \vartheta , \qquad c _ {1} = \frac {4 (m ^ {2} + 2) G ^ {2} \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1}}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \quad a n d \quad c _ {2} = c _ {0} + \vartheta c _ {1}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. By using the following conditions such that,the linear growth condition algebraic inequality <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-89"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { \left( \sum _ { i = 1 } ^ { q } r _ { i } \right) ^ { 2 } \le q \sum _ { i = 1 } ^ { q } r _ { i } ^ { 2 } } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , and the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality, the Itob isometry equation <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-7">(6)</xref>, we get</p><disp-formula id="equation-27"><tex-math id="math-90"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq 4 \mathbb {E} (u _ {0} ^ {2}) \vartheta + \frac {4 \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t)}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \Bigg [ \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi^ {\prime} (z) (| g (z, U (z)) | ^ {2}) d z\right) \\ \qquad + \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi_ {0} ^ {\prime} \left(| \sum_ {i = 0} ^ {m} \rho^ {i} (z, U (z)) | ^ {2}\right) d z\right) \\ \qquad + \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} \psi^ {\prime} (z) \left(| f (z, U (z)) | ^ {2}\right) d z\right) \Bigg ] \\ \leq 4 \mathbb {E} (u _ {0} ^ {2}) \vartheta + \frac {4 \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t)}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} G (1 + | U (z) | ^ {2}) d z\right) \\ \qquad + \frac {4 \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t) m ^ {2}}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} G (1 + | U (z) | ^ {2}) d z\right) \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><disp-formula id="equation-28"><tex-math id="math-91"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} + \frac {4 \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t) m ^ {2}}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} G (1 + | U (z) | ^ {2}) d z\right) \\ \leq 4 \mathbb {E} (u _ {0} ^ {2}) \vartheta + \frac {4 (m ^ {2} + 2) \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t) G ^ {2}}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)} \mathbb {E} \left(\int_ {0} ^ {t} G (1 + | U (z) | ^ {2}) d z\right). \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Take,</p><disp-formula id="equation-29"><tex-math id="math-92"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ {0} = 4 \mathbb {E} (u _ {0} ^ {2}) \vartheta \quad a n d \quad c _ {1} = \frac {4 (m ^ {2} + 2) \psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (t) G ^ {2}}{(2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Which follows that</p><disp-formula id="equation-30"><tex-math id="math-93"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq c _ {0} + c _ {1} \Bigg (\int_ {0} ^ {\vartheta} (1 + 2 \mathbb {E} | U (z) | ^ {2}) d z \Bigg) \\ \qquad \qquad \qquad \leq \underbrace {(c _ {0} + c _ {1} \vartheta)} _ {c _ {2}} + 2 c _ {1} \int_ {0} ^ {\vartheta} \mathbb {E} | U (z) | ^ {2} d z \\ \qquad \qquad \qquad \leq c _ {2} + 2 c _ {1} \int_ {0} ^ {\vartheta} \mathbb {E} | U (z) | ^ {2} d z. \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Therefore, we conclude it by</p><disp-formula id="equation-31"><tex-math id="math-94"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left\| A (U) \right\| ^ {2} \leq c _ {2} + 2 c _ {1} \| U \| ^ {2}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Now, we can simply demonstrate an upper growth bound for a random solu tion <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-95"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u _ { 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is bounded.</p><p>Then the following theorem, we combine the Gronwall inequality with Lemma (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4">4.1</xref>). □<target id="anchor-5" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 4.2.</bold><italic>Given that the condition of linear growth stated in</italic><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-19">(12)</xref>, <italic>we get</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-32"><tex-math id="math-96"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq c _ {2} e ^ {2 c _ {1} t}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula></sec><sec id="sec-5"><title>5. ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR</title><p>From the previous result, the energy solution is satisfies an exponential growth bound at a given time <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-97"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle t \in [ 0 , \vartheta ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Therefore, behavior of an energy solution and finding a growth of time is very large. Then the growth rate of the solution has the finite upper bound.</p><p><bold>Corollary 5.1. </bold><italic>Let the condition of Theorem</italic> (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-5">4.2</xref>) <italic>and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-98"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 0 < \gamma < 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> are exist, thus we can get</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-33"><tex-math id="math-99"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \lim _ {t \to + \infty} s u p \frac {l o g \Big (\mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \Big)}{t} \leq 2 c _ {1}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Recall from Theorem (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-5">4.2</xref>) that</p><disp-formula id="equation-34"><tex-math id="math-100"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq c _ {2} e ^ {2 c _ {1} t}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Taking log on both sides then the equation becomes,</p><disp-formula id="equation-35"><tex-math id="math-101"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \log \left(\mathbb {E} (| A (U (\vartheta)) | ^ {2})\right) \leq \log \left(c _ {2}\right) + 2 c _ {1} t. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Then, dividing both sides by <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-102"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \cdot _ { t } , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and taking lim sup, we get</p><disp-formula id="equation-36"><tex-math id="math-103"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \lim _ {t \to + \infty} s u p \frac {l o g \left(\mathbb {E} (| A (U (\vartheta)) | ^ {2})\right)}{t} \leq \lim _ {t \to + \infty} \left(\frac {l o g (c _ {2})}{t} + 2 c _ {1}\right) \leq 2 c _ {1}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Hence proved.</p></sec><sec id="sec-6"><title>6. EXAMPLES</title><p>In this section, we demonstrate the fractional stochastic diferential equation and verifying that it is unique and bounded.</p><p><bold>Example 6.1</bold>. <italic>Given </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-104"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \textstyle \gamma = { \frac { 3 } { 4 } } , \quad \psi ( t ) = { \sqrt { t + 1 } } , \quad m = 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and $P = </italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">[1]</xref><italic>$ to define the following fractional stochastic diferential equation:</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-37"><tex-math id="math-105"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left\{ \begin{array}{l} ^ {C} D _ {\psi} ^ {\gamma} U (t) = \cos (U (t)) d t + t ^ {2} U (t) t + U (t) d W (t), \\ U (0) = u _ {0} = 1. \end{array} \right.\tag{15} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Here we place <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-106"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle g [ t , U ( t ) ] = \cos ( U ( t ) ) , \ f [ t , U ( t ) ] = \ t ^ { 2 } U ( t ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-107"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho [ t , U ( t ) ] = \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-108"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle U ( t ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p>It can be observed that the maps g and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-109"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> meet the conditions <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-18">(11)</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-19">(12)</xref> with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-110"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { G = J = \frac { e } { 3 } } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p>Further,</p><disp-formula id="equation-38"><tex-math id="math-111"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \frac {3 (2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)}{\psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (\vartheta) (m ^ {2} + 2)} = 1. 1 > J. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>By verifying Theorem (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-5">4.2</xref>) and the existence and uniqueness of the solution <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-37">(15)</xref>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-39"><tex-math id="math-112"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq 1 2. 3 e ^ {8. 3 t}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Additionally, solution achieves</p><disp-formula id="equation-40"><tex-math id="math-113"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \lim _ {t \to + \infty} s u p \frac {l o g \Big (\mathbb {E} (| A (U (\vartheta)) | ^ {2}) \Big)}{t} \leq 8. 3. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the system <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-37">(15)</xref> is unique and bounded.</p><p><bold>Example 6.2.</bold><italic>Given </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-114"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { \gamma = \frac { 2 } { 3 } , \quad \psi ( t ) = e ^ { t } , \quad m = 1 } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and $P =[0,1] to define the following fractional stochastic diferential equation:</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-41"><tex-math id="math-115"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left\{ \begin{array}{l} ^ {C} D _ {\psi} ^ {\gamma} U (t) = [ \frac {3}{5} U (t) + \psi_ {0} ^ {\frac {3}{5}} (t) ] d t + \sqrt {t} U (t) d t + \frac {U (t)}{1 + \psi_ {0} (t)} d W (t), \\ U (0) = u _ {0} = 1. \end{array} \right.\tag{16} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Here we place g <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-116"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { \mathbf { \Omega } _ { \prime } [ t , U ( t ) ] = \frac { 3 } { 5 } U ( t ) + \psi _ { 0 } ^ { \frac { 3 } { 5 } } ( t ) , \mathbf { \Omega } f [ t , U ( t ) ] = \sqrt { t } U ( t ) } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-117"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho [ t , U ( t ) ] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-118"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { = \frac { U ( t ) } { 1 + \psi _ { 0 } ( t ) } } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p>Then, it can be observed that the maps <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-119"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle g \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-120"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \rho \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> meets the conditions <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-18">(11)</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-19">(12)</xref> with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-121"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { G = J = \frac { 1 } { 3 } } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p>Further,</p><disp-formula id="equation-42"><tex-math id="math-122"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \frac {3 (2 \gamma - 1) \Gamma^ {2} (\gamma)}{\psi_ {0} ^ {2 \gamma - 1} (\vartheta) (m ^ {2} + 2)} = 0. 9 > J. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-123"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathrm { B y } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> verifying Theorem (<xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-5">4.2</xref>) and the existence and uniqueness of the solution <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-41">(16)</xref>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-43"><tex-math id="math-124"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {E} (| A (U (t)) | ^ {2}) \leq 6. 1 e ^ {2. 6 t}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Additionally, solution achieves</p><disp-formula id="equation-44"><tex-math id="math-125"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \lim _ {t \to + \infty} s u p \frac {l o g \Big (\mathbb {E} (| A (U (\vartheta)) | ^ {2}) \Big)}{t} \leq 2. 6. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the system <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-41">(16)</xref> is unique and bounded.</p></sec><sec id="sec-7"><title>7. CONCLUDING REMARKS</title><p>In this study, the <italic>ψ</italic>-Caputo fractional derivative involving the single valued function was discussed and a general analytical framework ensuring the existence and uniqueness of the solutions. The existence and uniqueness of solution was derived by using the Banach’s fixed point theorem. The obtained energy growthbound and asymptotic results describe the bounded and long-term behavior of the system. An example is provided to demonstrate our findings. This methodology provides a basis for future investigations of nonlinear and coupled systems. Practical applications will be improved by the development of the numerical techniques.</p></sec></body><back><sec sec-type="data-availability"><title>Data Availability Statement</title><p>No new data were created or analyzed in this study.</p></sec><sec sec-type="author-contributions"><title>Author Contributions.</title><p>Conceptualisation, R. Hariharan(R.H) and R. Udhayakumar(R.U).; methodology, R.U; validation, R.H. and R.U.; formal analysis, R.H.; investigation, R.U.; resources, R.H.; writing original draft preparation, R.H., and R.U; writing review and editing, R.U.; visualisation, R.U.; supervision, R.U.; project administration, R.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors contributed equally to this paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.</p></sec><ack><title>Acknowledgment.</title><p>The authors thank the reviewer and editor’s constructive feedback, which helped improve the paper’s quality.</p></ack><ref-list><title>REFERENCES</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A maximum principle for sdes of mean-field type</article-title><source>Applied Mathematics and Optimization</source><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andersson</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Djehiche</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><page-range>341-356,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00245-010-9123-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Iterative approximation of positive solutions for fractional boundary value problem on the half-line</article-title><source>Filomat</source><volume>32</volume><issue>18</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chamekh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghanmi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Horrigue</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>6177-6187,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2298/FIL1818177C</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Existence results for nonlinear boundary value problems</article-title><source>Filomat</source><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghanmi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Horrigue</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>609-618,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2298/FIL1802609G</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Existence of positive solutions for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional diferential equations</article-title><source>Ukrainian Mathematical Journal</source><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghanmi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Horrigue</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>39-49,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11253-019-01623-w</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Fractional calculus: An introduction for physicists</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herrmann</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><publisher-name>World Scientific</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1142/9789813274587</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Exponential synchronization of dynamical complex networks via random impulsive scheme</article-title><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control</source><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>X.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>816-832,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15388/namc.2024.29.35728</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Some non-existence results for a class of stochastic partial diferential equations</article-title><source>Journal of Diferential Equations</source><volume>266</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foondun</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nane</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>2575-2596,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jde.2018.08.039</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A Caputo fractional derivative of a function with respect to another function</article-title><source>Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation</source><volume>44</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almeida</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>460-481,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.09.006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Functional diferential equations involving the ψ−Caputo fractional derivative</article-title><source>Fractal and Fractional</source><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Almeida</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>29,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fractalfract4020029</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>New investigation on the nonlinear fractional integro-diferential stochastic delayed system with impulsive efects: Existence and controllability</article-title><source>Complex Analysis and Operator Theory</source><volume>19</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>O.P.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vats</surname><given-names>R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>144,</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Existence and uniqueness of Hilfer-Katugampola fractional diferential equations with almost sectorial operators</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hariharan</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saradha</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Udhayakumar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>Complex Analysis and Operator Theory</article-title><volume>19</volume><year>2025</year><page-range>220,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11785-025-01850-z</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Existence of mild solutions for fractional evolution equations</article-title><source>Journal of Integral Equations and Applications</source><volume>25</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>X.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><page-range>557-586,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1216/JIE-2013-25-4-557</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Cauchy problems for fractional diferential equations with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives</article-title><source>Journal of Functional Analysis</source><volume>263</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><page-range>476-510,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfa.2012.04.011</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Existence uniqueness of mild solutions for ψ−Caputo fractional stochastic evolution equations driven by fBm</article-title><source>Journal of Inequalities and Applications</source><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>170,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13660-021-02703-x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Non-instantaneous impulsive ψ-hilfer fractional stochastic system with rosenblatt process and approximate controllability</article-title><source>Journal of Control and Decision</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gokul</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Udhayakumar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>1-13,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23307706.2025.2492651</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>On a mild solution to Hilfer time-fractional stochastic diferetial equation</article-title><source>Journal of Fractional Calculus and Application</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Omaba</surname><given-names>M.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1-10,</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://jfca" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Website link">Website link</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>New study on impulsive fractional neutral-type stochastic system with nonlocal conditions: Existence and approximate controllability</article-title><source>Complex Analysis and Operator Theory</source><volume>19</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>O.P.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vats</surname><given-names>R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanwar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>183,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11785-025-01775-7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>New results on existence and controllability of nonlinear fractional Sobolev-type delayed stochastic system with instantaneous impulses and noncompact semigroups</article-title><source>Journal of Analysis</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>O.P.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vats</surname><given-names>R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><ext-link xlink:href="https://link.springer.com/article/" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Article">Article</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Multivalued fractional diferential equations</article-title><source>Applied Mathematics and Computation</source><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>El-Sayed</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>A.G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1995</year><page-range>15-25,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0096-3003(94)00080-N</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Existence results for fractional stochastic evolution equations with infinite delay on an infinite interval l ∈ (1, 2</article-title><source>Complex Analysis and Operator Theory</source><volume>19</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nandhaprasadh</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Udhayakumar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>82,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11785-025-01707-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Existence and uniqueness of solution for a ψ−Riemann-Liouville fractional stochastic diferential equation</article-title><source>Complex Analysis and Operator Theory</source><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammami</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Horrigue</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gasmi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>44,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11785-025-01668-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Atangana–Baleanu time-fractional stochastic integrodiferential equation</article-title><source>Partial diferential equations in applied mathematics</source><volume>4</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Omaba</surname><given-names>M.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Enyi</surname><given-names>C.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>100100,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100100</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>On a study of the representation of solutions of a Ψ-Caputo fractional diferential equations with a single delay</article-title><source>Electronic Research Archive</source><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Aydin, N. I. Mahmudov, H. Aktuglu, E. Baytun ̧c, and M. S. Atamert</string-name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>625-635,</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.aimspress.com/" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Website link">Website link</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Approximate controllability of Ψ-Caputo fractional diferential equation</article-title><source>Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences</source><volume>46</volume><issue>17</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bose</surname><given-names>C.S.Varun</given-names></name><name><surname>Udhayakumar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>17660-17671,</page-range><comment>// /10 1002/ 9 23.</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Theory and applications of fractional diferential equations</article-title><volume>204</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kilbas</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Fractional boundary value problem with ψ-Caputo fractional derivative</article-title><source>Proceedings-Mathematical Sciences</source><volume>129</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdo</surname><given-names>M.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Panchal</surname><given-names>S.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saeed</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>65,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12044-019-0514-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Processing fractional diferential equations using ψ-Caputo derivative</article-title><source>Symmetry</source><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tayeb</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boulares</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moumen</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Imsatfia</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>955,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/sym15040955</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A study on approximate controllability of ψ−Caputo fractional diferential equations with impulsive effects</article-title><source>Contemporary Mathematics</source><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bose</surname><given-names>C.S.Varun</given-names></name><name><surname>Udhayakumar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muthukumaran</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Omari</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>175-198,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37256/cm.5120243539</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>On the ψ−Hilfer fractional derivative</article-title><source>Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulations</source><volume>60</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>C Sousa</surname><given-names>J.Vanterler</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>E.Capelas</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>72-91,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Stochastic processes and applications</article-title><volume>60</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pavliotis</surname><given-names>G.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The Banach fixed point theorem: selected topics from its hundred-year history</article-title><source>Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales−Serie A: Matematicas</source><volume>118</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Jachymski, I. J ́o ́zwik, and M. Terepeta</string-name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>140,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13398-024-01636-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Some Gronwall type inequalities and applications</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sever</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dragomir</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><publisher-name>Nova Science Publishers, Inc</publisher-name></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>