<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2460-0245</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JIMS</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2460-0245</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2086-8952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>IndoMS</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22342/jims.v32i2.2009</article-id><article-categories></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Structural Properties and Reverse Topological Indices of Order GCD Graphs of Integers Modulo Ring</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abdurahim</surname><given-names>Abdurahim</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>abdurahim@staff.unram.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Romdhini</surname><given-names>Mamika Ujianita</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>mamika@unram.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Maharani</surname><given-names>Andika Ellena Saufika Hakim</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>a.ellena.saufika@staff.unram.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Astuti</surname><given-names>Mulia</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>mulia_astuti@unib.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Mathematics</institution><institution-wrap><institution>University of Mataram</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00fq07k50</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1"><institution-wrap><institution>University of Bengkulu</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04w077t62</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: Mamika Ujianita Romdhini. Email: <email>mamika@unram.ac.id</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-23" publication-format="electronic"><day>23</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-04-23" publication-format="electronic"><day>23</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>JUNE</issue-title><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-04-12"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-02-15"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jims-a.org/index.php/jimsa/article/view/2009" xlink:title="2009"></self-uri><abstract><p>The order GCD graph of a ring, having the ring elements as the vertex set, and two distinct vertices are adjacent if and only if the greatest common divisor (gcd) of the order of both vertices is equal to the order of the product of these two vertices in the ring. This paper aims to analyze the reverse Sombor, Randić, and Harmonic indices of the order GCD graph where the set of vertices is integers modulo ring elements. The results provide new insights into the mathematical properties of reverse topological indices and their potential applications.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Order GCD Graph</kwd><kwd>integers modulo ring</kwd><kwd>reverse Sombor index</kwd><kwd>reverse Randic index</kwd><kwd>reverse harmonic index</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value>https://jatseditor.com</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec-1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The reverse topological index is a modification of the conventional topological index, which is based on vertex degree. It uses the reverse vertex degree, defined as the maximum degree of the graph minus the degree of the given vertex, plus 1. The reverse topological index was first introduced by Ediz in 2015 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">[1]</xref>. In this article, the reverse second Zagreb index of chemical trees was introduced. The following year, Ediz studied the reverse Zagreb index of the Cartesian product of graphs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">[2]</xref>, and in 2018, he further examined the reverse first beta Zagreb index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">[3]</xref>. As scientific knowledge continues to advance, the reverse topological index has become an intriguing subject of research. This is evident from several publications related to the reverse topological index and its significance in chemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">[4]</xref>. These studies inspired Swamy et al. (2020) to define the reverse Sombor index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">[5]</xref>, and the reverse Euler Sombor index has been reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">[6]</xref>. Furthermore, investigations have examined various reverse topological indices of bistar graphs and the corona product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">[7]</xref>.</p><p>The development of graph theory is no longer limited to simple graphs defined by vertex and edge sets. Still, it has expanded to encompass various algebraic structures, such as groups, rings, and fields, as seen in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">9</xref>] and ofers background relevant to subgroup-induced graph structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">[10]</xref>. Moreover, the constructed graph is extended to various graph types, as described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">12</xref>]. This exploration not only enriches pure mathematics but also opens numerous applications in applied fields, including cryptography, coding theory, communication networks, and computer science. One example of a graph defined by group elements is the GCD graph. It was first formally introduced by Klotz and Sander in 2007 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">[13]</xref>, when they discussed unitary Cayley graphs, and has since become an interesting new graph to study. Six years later, they showed the relationship between the GCD graph and the graph products. In 2024, Sarkar and Patra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">[14]</xref> introduced a new definition: the order GCD graph associated with the integer modulo group <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { n } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. However, this paper did not mention whether <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-2"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle n = 2 p ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-3"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an odd prime, and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-4"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an integer. This research gap warrants further examination, which is the urgency of this research.</p><p>Furthermore, in previous studies on reverse topological indices, the Order GCD graph has not been examined. There has been research on this graph <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">[15]</xref>, and in the context of the Sombor index for the group of integers modulo a prime power <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">[16]</xref>. Therefore, this article aims to investigate several reverse topological indices of the order GCD graph derived from the ring of integers modulo <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-5"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 p ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-6"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an odd prime and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-7"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an integer. Furthermore, the reverse topological indices studied include the Sombor, Randic, and Harmonic indices.</p></sec><sec id="sec-2"><title>2. Preliminaries</title><p>Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-8"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle G \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> be a simple graph with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-9"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V ( G ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> being the set of vertices and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-10"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle E ( G ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> being the edge set. Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-11"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle uv \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> be the edge between vertices <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-12"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-13"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and deg(u) is the number of vertices that are adjacent to the vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-14"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The reverse vertex degree of vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-15"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in a graph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-16"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle G \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> was first introduced by Ediz and Cancan in 2016 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">[2]</xref>. It is denoted by <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-17"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ { v } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and defined as <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-18"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ { v } = \Delta - \deg ( v ) + 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-19"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Delta \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the maximum degree in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-20"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle G \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. With the definition of reverse vertex degree, several reverse topological indices have been introduced, such as the second reverse Zagreb index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">[1]</xref>, the first reverse beta Zagreb index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">[2]</xref>, and the reverse Sombor index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">[3]</xref>. Among these reverse indices, Swamy et al. in 2020 defined the reverse Sombor index <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-21"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle (RSO) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of a graph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-22"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle G \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">[5]</xref> as follows:</p><disp-formula id="equation-1"><tex-math id="math-23"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R S O (G) = \sum_ {u v \in E (G)} \sqrt {(c _ {u}) ^ {2} + (c _ {v}) ^ {2}}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Following the same logic as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">[2]</xref>, the reverse indices of Randic (RR) and Harmonic (RH) of a graph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-24"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle G \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are defined as follows:</p><disp-formula id="equation-2"><tex-math id="math-25"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R R (G) = \sum_ {u v \in E (G)} \frac {1}{\sqrt {c _ {u} \cdot c _ {v}}}, \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><disp-formula id="equation-3"><tex-math id="math-26"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R H (G) = \sum_ {u v \in E (G)} \frac {2}{c _ {u} + c _ {v}}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Throughout this paper, the order GCD graph of the integer modulo <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-27"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is denoted as <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-28"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The set of vertices in this graph is all elements of the <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-29"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ring and is denoted as <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-30"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V \left( \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Two distinct vertices <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-31"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \not = v \in V \left( \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are adjacent if and only if the greatest common divisor (gcd) of the order of both vertices is equal to the order of the product of these two vertices, or, in other words, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-32"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { \operatorname { gcd } ( o ( u ) , o ( v ) ) = o ( u \cdot v ) } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">[14]</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="sec-3"><title>3. Main Results</title><p>In this section, we examine the properties of the order GCD graph for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-33"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and discuss the computation of its reverse-based topological indices. The mentioned 3 indices are given as follows: reverse Sombor, reverse Randic, and reverse Harmonic indices.</p><sec id="sec-4"><title>3.1. Properties of Order GCD Graph.</title><p>Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-34"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ring, we get the order of elements of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-35"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-36"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( 0 ) = 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-37"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(1)=o(5)=o(7)=o(11)=o(13)=o(17)=18 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><tex-math id="math-38"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(2)=o(4)=o(8)=o(10)=o(14)=o(16)=9 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><tex-math id="math-39"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(3)=o(15)=6 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-40"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(6)=o(12)=3 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-41"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( 9 ) = 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Now we list the gcd of every pair of elements of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-42"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>GCD of Every Pair of Elements of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-43"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-44"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle gcd \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-45"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(0) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-46"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(1) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-47"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(2) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-48"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(3) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-49"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(4) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-50"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(5) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-51"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(6) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-52"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(7) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-53"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(8) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-54"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(9) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-55"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(10) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-56"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(11) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-57"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(12) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-58"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(13) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-59"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(14) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-60"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(15) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-61"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(16) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-62"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(17) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-63"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(0) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-64"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(1) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-65"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(2) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-66"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(3) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-67"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(4) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-68"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(5) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-69"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(6) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-70"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(7) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-71"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(8) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-72"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(9) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-73"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(10) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-74"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(11) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-75"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(12) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-76"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(13) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-77"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(14) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-78"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(15) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-79"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(16) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-80"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o(17) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Next, the order of the product between two distinct elements of the ring is as follows in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table-2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Order of the Product Between Two Distinct Elements of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-81"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p></caption><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><thead><tr><th scope="col"><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-82"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( u \cdot v ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th><th scope="col">0</th><th scope="col">1</th><th scope="col">2</th><th scope="col">3</th><th scope="col">4</th><th scope="col">5</th><th scope="col">6</th><th scope="col">7</th><th scope="col">8</th><th scope="col">9</th><th scope="col">10</th><th scope="col">11</th><th scope="col">12</th><th scope="col">13</th><th scope="col">14</th><th scope="col">15</th><th scope="col">16</th><th scope="col">17</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>0</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>6</td><td>1</td><td>6</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>3</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>1</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>3</td><td>-</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>1</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>9</td><td>18</td><td>3</td><td>18</td><td>9</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-83"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>a. By the same argument, we also get the order GCD graph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-84"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>  as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>b.</p><fig id="figure-1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Order GCD Graph</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jims-a.org/index.php/jimsa/article/download/2009/554/13938" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 1.</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Taking into account the illustrations in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>b  it can be seen that <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-85"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> consists of two types of degree of vertex. However, the pattern of vertex degrees difers for odd and even prime numbers <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-86"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Theorems <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref> and <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-89b4b0ef-1921-4368-8819-945ff0c5bcc1">3.2</xref> support this distinction, as presented below.<target id="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494" target-type="reference-target"/><bold>Theorem 3.1.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-87"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of the integer modulo ring </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-88"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>， where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-89"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an odd prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-90"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an integer. Suppose that </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-91"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \in V \left( \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>, then</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-4"><tex-math id="math-92"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \deg (v) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l l} 2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) & , f o r \: v \in V _ {1} \\ 2 p ^ {k} - 1 & , f o r \: v \notin V _ {1}, \end{array} \right. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>where</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-93"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \dotsc , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \backslash \left\{ p ^ { k } \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-94"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \ldots , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \backslash \left\{ p ^ { k } \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We consider three cases as follows:</p><list list-type="order"><list-item><p><bold>Case 1:</bold> For <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-95"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u , v \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-96"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u = m p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-97"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v = n p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-98"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle m , n \in \left\{ 1 , 2 , 3 , \ldots , 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p><p>We get <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-99"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( u ) = \frac { l c m \left( m p , 2 p ^ { k } \right) } { m p } = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-100"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( v ) = { \frac { l c m \left( n p , 2 p ^ { k } \right) } { n p } } = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> which implies <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-101"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle gcd ( o ( u ) , o ( v ) ) = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Meanwhile, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-102"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \cdot v = m n p ^ { 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> yields <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-103"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( u \cdot v ) = p ^ { k - 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Hence, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-104"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle gcd( o ( u ) , o ( v ) ) \neq o ( u \cdot v ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Therefore, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-105"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-106"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are not adjacent.</p></list-item><list-item><p><bold>Case 2:</bold> When <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-107"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u , v \notin V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, then we have <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-108"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \operatorname* { g c d } ( u , p ^ { k } ) = 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-109"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \operatorname* { g c d } ( v , 2 p ^ { k } ) = 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Consequently, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-110"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( u ) = { \frac { l c m ( u , 2 p ^ { k } ) } { u } } = { \frac { u \cdot 2 p ^ { k } } { u } } = 2 p ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-111"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( v ) = { \frac { l c m ( v , 2 p ^ { k } ) } { v } } = 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-112"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \cdot v \notin V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, in the same manner, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-113"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( u \cdot v ) = 2 p ^ { k } . \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> Thus <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-114"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { \operatorname { gcd } ( o ( u ) , o ( v ) ) = o ( u \cdot v ) } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> which means <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-115"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-116"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are adjacent.</p></list-item><list-item><p><bold>Case 3:</bold> Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-117"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and  <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-118"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \notin \ V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. According to the argument in the first and second cases, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-119"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \operatorname* { g c d } ( o ( u ) , o ( v ) ) = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-120"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \cdot v = r p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-121"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle r \in \{ 1 , 2 , 3 , \dotsc , 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Therefore, it sufices to prove that <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-122"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o ( u \cdot v ) = 2 p ^ { k - \mathrm { i } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> which means <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-123"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-124"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are adjacent.</p></list-item></list><p>Based on the three cases above, it can be concluded that any vertex  <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-125"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \notin V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is adjacent to all vertices in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-126"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Meanwhile, any two vertices <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-127"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-128"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle w \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-129"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are not adjacent. Furthermore, the number of elements in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-130"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-131"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 1 } | = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Since each vertex  <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-132"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \notin \ V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is adjacent to all vertices in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-133"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , its degree is given by <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-134"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \deg ( u ) = 2 p ^ { k } - 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, since each vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-135"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is only adjacent to vertices outside <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-136"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, its degree is equal to <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-137"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V | \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> minus <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-138"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| V _ { 1 } \right| \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which results in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-139"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \deg ( v ) = p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> .<target id="anchor-89b4b0ef-1921-4368-8819-945ff0c5bcc1" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.2.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-140"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of integers modulo ring </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-141"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> for </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-142"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an even prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-143"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an integer. Suppose that </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-144"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \in V \left( \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>, then</italic></p><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-145"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \operatorname{deg}(v)=\begin{cases}2(p^k-p^{k-1})+1, & \text{for } v\in V_1\\2p^k-1, & \text{for } v\notin V_1\end{cases} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p><italic>where</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-146"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V_1=\{p,2p,3p,\ldots,(2p^{k-1}-1)p\}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p><italic>Proof</italic>. The proof follows a similar approach to the proof of Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref>.</p><p>The following theorem presents the reverse vertex degrees of the GCD graph for odd prime <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-147"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Theorem 3.3 and even prime in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-07f9f095-c25a-47b0-a5ac-e64e220e002c">3.4</xref>.<target id="anchor-170dce5d-7272-41b9-9827-3aa826db501b" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.3. </bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-148"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of integers modulo ring </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-149"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> for odd prime </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-150"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-151"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an integer, then the reverse vertex degree of a vertex in </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-152"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-5"><tex-math id="math-153"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ {v} = \left\{ \begin{array}{l l} 2 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) & , v \in V _ {1} \\ 1 & , v \notin V _ {1}, \end{array} \right. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>where</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-154"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \dotsc , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \backslash \left\{ p ^ { k } \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Based on Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref>, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-155"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Delta = 2 p ^ { k } - 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, by the definition of the reverse degree, we have <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-156"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ { u } = 2 \left( p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-157"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ { v } = 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-158"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-159"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v \not \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. <target id="anchor-07f9f095-c25a-47b0-a5ac-e64e220e002c" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.4.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-160"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of integers modulo ring </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-161"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> for even prime </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-162"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-163"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an integer, then the reverse vertex degree of a vertex in </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-164"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-6"><tex-math id="math-165"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ {v} = \left\{ \begin{array}{l l} 2 p ^ {k - 1} - 1 & , v \in V _ {1} \\ 1 & , v \notin V _ {1}, \end{array} \right. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>where</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-166"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \ldots , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p><p><italic>Proof</italic>. It is proven based on Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-89b4b0ef-1921-4368-8819-945ff0c5bcc1">3.2</xref> and the definition of the reverse degree. </p><p>Furthermore, Theorems <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref> and <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-89b4b0ef-1921-4368-8819-945ff0c5bcc1">3.2</xref> imply the following theorem about the computation of the number of edges in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-167"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma ( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.<target id="anchor-a6bf6e81-8938-4889-a1da-df04f23766da" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.5.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-168"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of integers modulo ring </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-169"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> for odd prime </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-170"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-171"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer. Then the number of edges in Γ </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-172"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-7"><tex-math id="math-173"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| E \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) \right| = \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) \left(2 p ^ {k} + 2 p ^ {k - 1} - 3\right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-174"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V_1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> be defined as <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-175"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \dotsc , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \backslash \left\{ p ^ { k } \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Based on Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref>, the degrees of the vertices are given by <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-176"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \deg ( v _ { 1 } ) = 2 \left( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-177"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \deg ( v _ { 2 } ) = 2 p ^ { k } - 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-178"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-179"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 2 } \notin V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, the number of vertices in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-180"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-181"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | \dot { V } _ { 1 } | = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This means that the number of vertices with degree <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-182"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \deg ( v _ { 1 } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-183"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Consequently, the number of vertices with degree <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-184"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle deg(v_2) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by the total number of vertices minus <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-185"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 1 } | \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, Since the number of edges in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-186"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is equal to half of the sum of all vertex degrees <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">[17]</xref>, we obtain the following result based on Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref>:</p><disp-formula id="equation-8"><tex-math id="math-187"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| E \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) \right| = \frac {1}{2} \sum_ {v \in V \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right)} \deg (v) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><disp-formula id="equation-9"><tex-math id="math-188"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{align*}&= \frac{1}{2} \left( \sum_{v_1 \in V_1(\Gamma(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}))} \deg(v_1) + \sum_{v_2 \notin V_1(\Gamma(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}))} \deg(v_2) \right) \\&= \frac{1}{2} \left( 2 \left(p^{k-1} - 1\right) \left(2\left(p^k - p^{k-1} + 1\right)\right) + \left(2\left(p^k - p^{k-1} + 1\right)\right) \left(2p^k - 1\right) \right) \\&= \left(p^k - p^{k-1} + 1\right) \left(2\left(p^{k-1} - 1\right) + \left(2p^k - 1\right)\right) \\&= \left(p^k - p^{k-1} + 1\right) \left(2p^k + 2p^{k-1} - 3\right) .\end{align*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><target id="anchor-fe80259b-2e49-4a3e-902f-15f871844063" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.6.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-189"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of integers modulo ring </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-190"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> for even prime </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-191"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-192"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer. Then the number of edges in </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-193"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-10"><tex-math id="math-194"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| E \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) \right| = \left(2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1}\right) + 1\right) \left(p ^ {k} + p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-195"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \ldots , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Using the same reasoning as in the proof of Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-a6bf6e81-8938-4889-a1da-df04f23766da">3.5</xref>, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-196"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 1 } | = 2 { p } ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-197"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V \backslash V _ { 1 } | = 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } ) + 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Based on Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-89b4b0ef-1921-4368-8819-945ff0c5bcc1">3.2</xref>, we derive the following result:</p><disp-formula id="equation-11"><tex-math id="math-198"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{align*}\left|E \left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)\right| &= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{v \in V\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)} \deg(v) \\&= \frac{1}{2} \left( \sum_{v_1 \in V_1\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)} \deg(v_1) + \sum_{v_2 \notin V_1\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)} \deg(v_2) \right) \\&= \frac{1}{2} \left(2p^{k-1} - 1\right) \left(2 \left(p^k - p^{k-1}\right) + 1\right) + \left(2 \left(p^k - p^{k-1}\right) + 1\right) \left(2p^k - 1\right) \\&= \frac{1}{2} \left(2 \left(p^k - p^{k-1}\right) + 1\right) \left(\left(2p^{k-1} - 1\right) + \left(2p^k - 1\right)\right) \\&= \left(2 \left(p^k - p^{k-1}\right) + 1\right) \left(p^k + p^{k-1} - 1\right) .\end{align*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Observe the red vertices in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>b. If the edges incident to these vertices are removed, a complete subgraph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-199"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 1 4 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is formed for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-200"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma ( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and a complete subgraph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-201"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 9 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is formed for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-202"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma ( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><fig id="figure-2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Complete Subgraph of Order GCD Graph</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jims-a.org/index.php/jimsa/article/download/2009/554/13939" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 2.</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>However, if the edges forming the complete graph are removed from the graph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-203"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> pin <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>a, the resulting subgraph is a complete bipartite subgraph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-204"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 4 , 1 4 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3</xref>a. The partition of the set of vertices <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-205"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-206"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with all the members of each set which <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-207"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 1 } | = 4 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-208"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 2 } | = 1 4 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-209"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \cap V _ { 2 } = \emptyset \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Similarly, for the graph in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>b, the resulting subgraph is the complete bipartite graph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-210"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 9 , 7 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3</xref>b.</p><fig id="figure-3"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><p>Complete Bipartite Subgraph of Z2·23</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://jims-a.org/index.php/jimsa/article/download/2009/554/13940" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Figure 3.</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Therefore, a theorem regarding the subgraphs of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-211"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be established. This is formally stated in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-7278b6d0-7a07-47c6-93a2-76963d155794">3.7</xref> and Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-a87529ff-4979-4889-adc5-b94305103c29">3.8</xref> , as follows.<target id="anchor-7278b6d0-7a07-47c6-93a2-76963d155794" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.7.</bold><italic> Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-212"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of ring of integers modulo </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-213"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-214"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> an odd prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-215"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer, then a complete subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-216"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and a complete bipartite subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-217"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 ) , 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> are formed.</italic></p><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-218"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \ldots , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \backslash \{ p ^ { k } \} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. From the explanation in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref>, it is clear that two distinct vertices that are not in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-219"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, that is, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-220"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } \neq v _ { 2 } \notin V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> or equivalently <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-221"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } \ne v _ { 2 } \in V \backslash V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are adjacent. Therefore, the subgraph induced by the set of vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-222"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V \backslash V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> forms a complete graph. Furthermore, the number of vertices in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-223"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V \backslash V _ { 1 } { \mathrm { ~ i s ~ } } | V \backslash V _ { 1 } | { \mathrm { ~ = ~ 2 ~ } } ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Thus, one of the subgraphs of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-224"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the complete subgraph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-225"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p><p>Observe that if the edges forming the complete subgraph are removed from <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-226"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, it is evident that any vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-227"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u _ { 1 } \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is adjacent to any vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-228"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } \notin V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. According to Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref>, any two distinct vertices <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-229"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u _ { 1 } \neq u _ { 2 } \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are not adjacent. Therefore, a complete bipartite subgraph is formed with two partition sets: <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-230"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> dan <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-231"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V \backslash V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Thus, we obtain the complete bipartite subgraph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-232"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 ) , 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } . \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><target id="anchor-a87529ff-4979-4889-adc5-b94305103c29" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.8.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-233"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of ring of integers modulo </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-234"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-235"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> an even prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-236"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer, then a complete subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-237"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } ) + 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and a complete bipartite subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-238"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 , 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } ) + 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> are formed.</italic></p><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-239"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \ldots , \left( 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-240"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 1 } | = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, Furthermore, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-241"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| V \backslash V _ { 1 } \right| = 2 \left( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } \right) + 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Using the same reasoning as in the proof of Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-7278b6d0-7a07-47c6-93a2-76963d155794">3.7</xref>, we derive the complete subgraph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-242"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } ) + 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the complete bipartite subgraph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-243"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } ) + 1 , 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p><p>The number of edges in the subgraphs formed from Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-7278b6d0-7a07-47c6-93a2-76963d155794">3.7</xref> and Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-a87529ff-4979-4889-adc5-b94305103c29">3.8</xref> is stated, respectively, in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-bd346082-56cb-4030-936b-1896e89ddac7">3.9</xref> and Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-c40a8f7c-3ed7-47a2-b1ba-4182d068500e">3.10</xref> below.<target id="anchor-bd346082-56cb-4030-936b-1896e89ddac7" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.9.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-244"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of ring of integers modulo </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-245"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-246"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an odd prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-247"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is an integer. The number of edges in the complete subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-248"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and the complete bipartite subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-249"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 ) , 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> are respectively</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-12"><tex-math id="math-250"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| E \left(\Gamma \left(K _ {2 (p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1)}\right)\right) \right| = 2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + \frac {1}{2}\right), \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="equation-13"><tex-math id="math-251"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| E \left(\Gamma \left(K _ {2 (p ^ {k - 1} - 1), 2 (p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1)}\right)\right) \right| = 4 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Since <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-252"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a complete subgraph, the number of vertices in the subgraph is <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-253"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and each vertex has a degree of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-254"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) - 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, since the number of edges in a graph is equal to half of the sum of the degrees of all vertices <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">[17]</xref>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-14"><tex-math id="math-255"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}|E(\Gamma(K_{2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)}))|&=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\left(2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\right)\left(2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)-1\right)\\&=(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left(2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)-1\right)\\&=4\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+1\right)\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right).\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The complete bipartite graph is partitioned into two vertex sets, namely <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-256"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-257"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V \backslash V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Moreover, based on the explanations in the proofs of Theorems <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-4d3dde18-06ae-44e2-873c-fd33b1dea494">3.1</xref> and <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-7278b6d0-7a07-47c6-93a2-76963d155794">3.7</xref>, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-258"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 1 } | = 2 p ^ { k - 1 } - 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-259"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V \backslash V _ { 1 } | = 2 \left( p ^ { k } -  { p ^ { k - 1 } } + 1 \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In this case, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-260"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V _ { 1 } | \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be interpreted as the degree of any vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-261"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 2 } \in V \backslash V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and similarly, <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-262"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | V \backslash V _ { 1 } | \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be interpreted as the degree of any vertex <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-263"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the number of edges in the complete bipartite graph is given by</p><disp-formula id="equation-15"><tex-math id="math-264"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}|E(\Gamma(K_{2(p^{k-1}-1),2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)}))|&=\frac{1}{2}\left(\sum_{v_1\in V_1}\deg(v_1)+\sum_{v_2\in V\setminus V_1}\deg(v_2)\right)\\&=\frac{1}{2}\left(|V_1|\cdot\deg(v_1)+|V\setminus V_1|\cdot\deg(v_2)\right)\\&=\frac{1}{2}\left[(2p^{k-1}-2)\cdot2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\right.\\&\qquad\left.+2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\cdot(2p^{k-1}-2)\right]\\&=2(p^{k-1}-1)(p^k-p^{k-1}+1).\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><target id="anchor-c40a8f7c-3ed7-47a2-b1ba-4182d068500e" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.10. </bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-265"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of the ring of integers modulo </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-266"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-267"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> an even prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-268"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer. The number of edges in the complete subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-269"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and the complete bipartite subgraph </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-270"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle K _ { 2 ( p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 ) , 2 ( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 ) } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> are respectively</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-16"><tex-math id="math-271"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| E \left(\Gamma \left(K _ {2 (p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1)}\right)\right) \right| = \left(2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1}\right) + 1\right) \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1}\right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="equation-17"><tex-math id="math-272"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left| E \left(\Gamma \left(K _ {2 p ^ {k - 1} - 1, 2 (p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1)}\right)\right) \right| = \left(2 p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) \cdot \left(2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1}\right) + 1\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Using a similar explanation as in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-c40a8f7c-3ed7-47a2-b1ba-4182d068500e">3.10</xref> and the information from Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-c40a8f7c-3ed7-47a2-b1ba-4182d068500e">3.10</xref>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-18"><tex-math id="math-273"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}|E(\Gamma(K_{2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)}))|&=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\left(2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\right)\left(2(p^k-p^{k-1})\right)\\&=\left(2(p^k-p^{k-1})+1\right)\left(p^k-p^{k-1}\right).\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="equation-19"><tex-math id="math-274"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left. \right.\left| E \left(\Gamma \left(K _ {2 p ^ {k - 1} - 1, 2 (p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1}) + 1}\right)\right)\right| = \left(2 p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) \cdot \left(2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1}\right) + 1\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula></sec><sec id="sec-5"><title>3.2. Reverse-Based Topological Indices of Order GCD Graph.</title><p>This part investigates the reverse-based topological indices of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-275"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In particular, we first derive the reverse Sombor index, which is presented in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-b3eac3b1-815d-4b9c-aaab-adc5faaa6bf3">3.11</xref>.<target id="anchor-b3eac3b1-815d-4b9c-aaab-adc5faaa6bf3" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.11. </bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-276"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph of the ring of integers modulo </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-277"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>, where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-278"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> an odd prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-279"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer, then the reverse Sombor index is</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-20"><tex-math id="math-280"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R S O \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) = 2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) \left(2 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) \sqrt {4 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) ^ {2} + 1} + \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + \frac {1}{2}\right) \sqrt {2}\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-281"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V _ { 1 } = \left\{ p , 2 p , 3 p , \dotsc , \left( p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) p \right\} \backslash \{ p ^ { k } \} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-282"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u _ { 1 } \in V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-283"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } , v _ { 2 } \notin V _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. From Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-170dce5d-7272-41b9-9827-3aa826db501b">3.3</xref>, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-284"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ { u _ { 1 } } = 2 \left( p ^ { k - 1 } - 1 \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-285"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ { v _ { 1 } } = c _ { v _ { 2 } } = 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The number of edges connecting vertices <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-286"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle u _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-287"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is equal to the number of edges in the complete bipartite subgraph conforming Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-bd346082-56cb-4030-936b-1896e89ddac7">3.9</xref>), which is <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-288"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 4 \left ( p ^ { k - 1 } - { 1 } \right) \left( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 }  { + } 1 \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Next, the number of edges connecting vertices <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-289"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 1 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-290"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle v _ { 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is equal to the number of edges in the complete subgraph by Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-bd346082-56cb-4030-936b-1896e89ddac7">3.9</xref>), which is <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-291"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 \left( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + 1 \right) \left( p ^ { k } - p ^ { k - 1 } + \frac { 1 } { 2 } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p><p>Thus, the general formula for the Reverse Sombor index of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-292"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by</p><disp-formula id="equation-21"><tex-math id="math-293"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}RSO\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)&=\sum_{uv\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\sqrt{(c_u)^2+(c_v)^2}\\&=\sum_{u_1v_1\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\sqrt{(c_{u_1})^2+(c_{v_1})^2}+\sum_{v_1v_2\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\sqrt{(c_{v_1})^2+(c_{v_2})^2}.\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>By substituting the values obtained earlier, then</p><disp-formula id="equation-22"><tex-math id="math-294"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}RSO\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)&=4(p^{k-1}-1)(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\sqrt{(2(p^{k-1}-1))^2+1^2}\\&\quad+2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\sqrt{1^2+1^2}\\&=2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left[2(p^{k-1}-1)\sqrt{4(p^{k-1}-1)^2+1}\right.\\&\qquad\left.+\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\sqrt{2}\right],\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>and the proof is completed.</p><p>The following theorem presents the reverse Randic index, thereby complementing the previously discussed results.<target id="anchor-5a5c4083-ec5e-42e5-bab5-7d4228cc4dfb" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.12.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-295"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph ofthe ring ofintegers modulo </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-296"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-297"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> an odd prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-298"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer, then the reverse Randic index is</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-23"><tex-math id="math-299"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R R \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) = 2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) \left(\sqrt {2 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right)} + \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + \frac {1}{2}\right)\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. With the same argument as in the proof of Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-b3eac3b1-815d-4b9c-aaab-adc5faaa6bf3">3.11</xref>, we have</p><disp-formula id="equation-24"><tex-math id="math-300"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}RR\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)&=\sum_{uv\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\frac{1}{\sqrt{c_u\cdot c_v}}\\&=\sum_{u_1v_1\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\frac{1}{\sqrt{c_{u_1}\cdot c_{v_1}}}+\sum_{v_1v_2\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\frac{1}{\sqrt{c_{v_1}\cdot c_{v_2}}}\\&=4(p^{k-1}-1)(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\frac{1}{\sqrt{2(p^{k-1}-1)\cdot1}}\\&\quad+2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\frac{1}{\sqrt{1\cdot1}}\\&=2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left(\sqrt{2}(p^{k-1}-1)+\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right).\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Thus, the general formula for the Reverse Randi´c index of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-301"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="equation-25"><tex-math id="math-302"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R R \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) = 2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) \left(\sqrt {2 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right)} + \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + \frac {1}{2}\right)\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Next, we present the reverse harmonic index, which further extends the sequence of reverse-based topological indices discussed above.<target id="anchor-706b71b5-e1ce-4004-b35d-d94bdaabc8cf" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 3.13.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-303"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be the order GCD graph ofthe ring ofintegers modulo </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-304"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 { p } ^ { k } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> where </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-305"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> an odd prime and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-306"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k \geq 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> be an integer, then the reverse harmonic index is</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-26"><tex-math id="math-307"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R H \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) = 2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) \left(4 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) \frac {1}{2 p ^ {k - 1} - 1} + \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + \frac {1}{2}\right)\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Under the same assumptions as in the proof of Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-b3eac3b1-815d-4b9c-aaab-adc5faaa6bf3">3.11</xref>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-27"><tex-math id="math-308"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}RH\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)&=\sum_{uv\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\frac{2}{c_u+c_v}\\&=\sum_{u_1v_1\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\frac{2}{c_{u_1}+c_{v_1}}+\sum_{v_1v_2\in E\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2p^k}\right)\right)}\frac{2}{c_{v_1}+c_{v_2}}\\&=4(p^{k-1}-1)(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\frac{2}{2(p^{k-1}-1)+1}\\&\quad+2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\frac{2}{1+1}\\&=4(p^{k-1}-1)(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\frac{2}{2p^{k-1}-1}\\&\quad+2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\\&=2(p^k-p^{k-1}+1)\left(4(p^{k-1}-1)\frac{1}{2p^{k-1}-1}+\left(p^k-p^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right).\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Thus, the general formula for the reverse Harmonic index of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-309"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="equation-28"><tex-math id="math-310"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R H \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 p ^ {k}}\right)\right) = 2 \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + 1\right) \left(4 \left(p ^ {k - 1} - 1\right) \frac {1}{2 p ^ {k - 1} - 1} + \left(p ^ {k} - p ^ {k - 1} + \frac {1}{2}\right)\right). \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>In the order GCD graph <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-311"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma ( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>a, it is evident that <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-312"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \deg ( 3 ) = \deg ( 6 ) = \deg ( 1 2 ) = \deg ( 1 5 ) = 1 4 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In other words, the other vertices have a degree of 17. Based on the definition of the reverse degree, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-313"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle c _ { 3 } = c _ { 6 } = c _ { 1 2 } = c _ { 1 5 } = 4 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>  while the other vertices have a reverse degree of 1. The number of edges adjacent to vertices 3, 6, 12, and 15 is 56. Next, according to Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-a6bf6e81-8938-4889-a1da-df04f23766da">3.5</xref>, we find that <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-314"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | E ( \Gamma ( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } ) ) | = 1 4 7 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Thus, the number of edges adjacent to vertices other than 3, 6, 12, and 15 is 91. Therefore, based on the definition of the Reverse Sombor Index, we get</p><disp-formula id="equation-29"><tex-math id="math-315"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R S O \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2. 3 ^ {2}}\right)\right) = 9 1 \cdot \sqrt {1 ^ {2} + 1 ^ {2}} + 5 6 \cdot \sqrt {1 ^ {2} + 4 ^ {2}} = 9 1 \sqrt {2} + 5 6 \sqrt {1 7}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Next, by applying Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-b3eac3b1-815d-4b9c-aaab-adc5faaa6bf3">3.11</xref>, we have</p><disp-formula id="equation-30"><tex-math id="math-316"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}RSO\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2\cdot 3^2}\right)\right)&=2\left(3^2-3^{2-1}+1\right)\left(2\left(3^{2-1}-1\right)\sqrt{4(3^{2-1}-1)^2+1}\right.\\&\qquad\left.+\left(3^2-3^{2-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\sqrt{2}\right)\\&=14\left(4\sqrt{67}+\frac{13}{2}\sqrt{2}\right)\\RSO\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2\cdot 3^2}\right)\right)&=56\sqrt{67}+91\sqrt{2}.\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Using the same argument as in the calculation of the reverse Sombor index above, and based on the definition of the reverse Randic index, we have the following</p><disp-formula id="equation-31"><tex-math id="math-317"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R R \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 \cdot 3 ^ {2}}\right)\right) = 9 1 \cdot \frac {1}{\sqrt {1 \cdot 1}} + 5 6 \cdot \frac {1}{\sqrt {1 \cdot 4}} = 1 1 9. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>According to <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-5a5c4083-ec5e-42e5-bab5-7d4228cc4dfb">3.12</xref>, we can state that</p><disp-formula id="equation-32"><tex-math id="math-318"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R R \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2 \cdot 3 ^ {2}}\right)\right) = 2 \left(3 ^ {2} - 3 ^ {2 - 1} + 1\right) \left(\sqrt {2 \left(3 ^ {2 - 1} - 1\right)} + \left(3 ^ {2} - 3 ^ {2 - 1} + \frac {1}{2}\right)\right) = 1 1 9. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The reverse harmonic Index of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-319"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 \cdot 3 ^ { 2 } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> based on its definition is given by</p><disp-formula id="equation-33"><tex-math id="math-320"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle R H \left(\Gamma \left(\mathbb {Z} _ {2. 3 ^ {2}}\right)\right) = 9 1 \cdot \frac {2}{1 + 1} + 5 6 \cdot \frac {2}{1 + 4} = 1 1 3 \frac {2}{5}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Moreover, by Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-706b71b5-e1ce-4004-b35d-d94bdaabc8cf">3.13</xref>, it can be written as</p><disp-formula id="equation-34"><tex-math id="math-321"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{equation*}\begin{aligned}RH\left(\Gamma\left(\mathbb{Z}_{2\cdot 3^2}\right)\right)&=2\left(3^2-3^{2-1}+1\right)\left(4(3^{2-1}-1)\frac{1}{2\cdot3^{2-1}-1}+\left(3^2-3^{2-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right)\\&=14\left(8\cdot\frac{1}{5}+\frac{13}{2}\right)\\&=113\frac{2}{5}.\end{aligned}\end{equation*} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Regardless of whether the reverse index values are computed using the definition or the theorem, the results are the same.</p></sec></sec><sec id="sec-6"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this article, we have described the properties of the order GCD graph of <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-322"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \Gamma \left( \mathbb { Z } _ { 2 p ^ { k } } \right) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the formulation of reverse-based indices referred to as reverse Sombor, Randic, and Harmonic indices. We have calculated these indices for two cases: odd and even primes <italic>p.</italic> Future work may extend this study to finite abelian <italic>p</italic>-groups and to fuzzy subgroups of finite abelian groups, as discussed in recent literature. These frameworks ofer promising tools for developing more general subgroup-based and fuzzy graph models, thereby enhancing the scope and relevance of the results within algebraic graph theory.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>REFERENCES</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Maximum chemical trees of the second reverse zagreb index</article-title><source>Pacific Journal of Applied Mathematics</source><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ediz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><page-range>287,</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Reverse zagreb indices of cartesian product of graphs</article-title><source>International Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ediz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cancan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><page-range>51-58,</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Maximal graphs of the first reverse zagreb beta index</article-title><source>TWMS Journal of Applied and Engineering Mathematics</source><volume>8</volume><issue>1.1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ediz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>306-310,</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://dergipark.org" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Website link">Website link</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A study of reverse topological indices and their importance in chemical sciences</article-title><source>Applied Mathematics E-Notes</source><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jayanna</surname><given-names>G.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>175-186,</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://api" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Website link">Website link</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Reverse sombor index</article-title><source>Bulletin of International Mathematical Virtual Institute</source><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Swamy</surname><given-names>N.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manohar</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sooryanarayana</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gutman</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>267-272,</page-range><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.imvibl.org/buletin/bulletin" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Bulletin">Bulletin</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A study on the reverse euler sombor index of various graphs</article-title><source>South East Asian J. of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences</source><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirana</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shanmukha</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Usha</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>39-52,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-4390920/v1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A study of families of bistar and corona product of graph: Reverse topological indices</article-title><source>Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences</source><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gowtham</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Husin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>575-586,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47836/mjms.17.4.04</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Seidel laplacian and seidel signless laplacian energies of commuting graph for dihedral groups</article-title><source>Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences</source><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romdhini</surname><given-names>M.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nawawi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syechah</surname><given-names>B.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>701-713,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11113/mjfas.v20n3.3465</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Characteristic polynomial of maximum and minimum matrix of square power graph of dihedral group of order 2n with odd natural</article-title><source>\ &#34;$ International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics</source><volume>number $n</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siwach</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhatia</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sehgal</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rana</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>57-64,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22271/maths.2024.v9.i3a.1731</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The characteristic subgroups of an abelian p-group</article-title><source>Journal of Algebra</source><volume>663</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McLean</surname><given-names>K.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>838-856,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jalgebra.2024.10.001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Topological indices and structural properties of cubic power graph of dihedral group</article-title><source>Contemporary Mathematics</source><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rana</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sehgal</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhatia</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>761-779,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37256/cm.5120243029</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Structural properties and characteristic polynomials of cubic power graph of dihedral group</article-title><source>Mathematics and Statistics</source><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romdhini</surname><given-names>M.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rana</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sehgal</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhatia</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>97-104,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13189/ms.2025.130204</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Some properties of unitary cayley graphs</article-title><source>The electronic journal of combinatorics</source><volume>14</volume><issue>R45</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klotz</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sander</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><page-range>1-2,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37236/963</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The order gcd graph</article-title><source>Contemporary Mathematics</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sarkar</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Patra</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>2926-2932,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37256/cm.5320243600</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Perfect state transfer on gcd-graphs</article-title><source>Linear and Multilinear Algebra</source><volume>65</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pal</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattacharjya</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>1-12,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03081087.2016.1267105</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Sombor index of gcd graph for group of integers modulo power of prime</article-title><source>Universal Journal of Mathematics and Applications</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdurahim</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romdhini</surname><given-names>M.U.</given-names></name></person-group><comment>submitted, 2026.</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Handbook of mathematical induction</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gunderson</surname><given-names>D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosen</surname><given-names>K.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><page-range>-978142009365037871106</page-range><publisher-name>CRC Press LLC Boca Raton</publisher-name><ext-link xlink:href="https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781420093650" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Preview">Preview</ext-link></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>