<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2460-0245</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JIMS</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2460-0245</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">2086-8952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>IndoMS</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22342/jims.v32i1.1962</article-id><article-categories></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The Lieb and Nazarov Inequalities for Quaternion Linear Canonical S-Transform</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Danang</surname><given-names>Dahnial</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>dahnial22h@student.unhas.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bahri</surname><given-names>Mawardi</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>mawardibahri@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bachtiar</surname><given-names>Nasrullah</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>nasrullahmipa013@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Toaha</surname><given-names>Syamsuddin</given-names></name><address><country country="ID">Indonesia</country><email>syamsuddint@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Neswan</surname><given-names>Oki</given-names></name><address><email>okineswan@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Mathematics</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Hasanuddin University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/00da1gf19</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Actuarial Science</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Sumatera Institute of Technology</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/02jktx121</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Mathematics</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Institute of Biomedical Technologies</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04ehykb85</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="IT">Italy</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: Mawardi Bahri. Email: <email>mawardibahri@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-05" publication-format="electronic"><day>05</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-01-05" publication-format="electronic"><day>05</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>MARCH</issue-title><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-03-04"><day>04</day><month>03</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-06-13"><day>13</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jims-a.org/index.php/jimsa/article/view/1962" xlink:title="1962"></self-uri><abstract><p>This research introduces the quaternion linear canonical S-transform. This transform is an extension of the linear canonical S-transform within quaternion algebra. We recall the properties and present the natural link between the quaternion linear canonical transform and the quaternion linear canonical S-transform. We exploit these properties and relation to establish the Lieb and Nazarov inequalities to the quaternion linear canonical S-transform.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>quaternion linear canonical transform</kwd><kwd>S-transform</kwd><kwd>Lieb inequality</kwd><kwd>Nazarov</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value>https://jatseditor.com</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="sec-1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, the construction of numerous generalized transformations within quaternion algebra has received more attention by some researchers like the quaternion linear canonical wavelet transform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">[1]</xref>, the quaternion Wigner-Ville distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">5</xref>], the quaternion shearlet transform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">[6]</xref>, and the quaternion windowed Fourier transform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">[7]</xref>. Further, the authors of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">[8]</xref> have studied the linear canonical S-transform (LCST), which is the extension of the traditional S-transform in the framework of the linear canonical transform (LCT). It is known that several results of the traditional S-transform are modified in the LCST domain, such as modulation, translation, uncertainty inequalities and so on (see, e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">11</xref>].</p><p>Recently, the authors in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">[12]</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">[13]</xref> have studied the quaternion linear canonical S-transform and obtained the uncertainty relations. However, Lieb and Nazarov inequalities for this transformation have not been published to date. Therefore, in the present work, we will establish Lieb’s inequality for the quaternion linear canonical S-transform. To achieve the result, we recall several results of the quaternion linear canonical S-transform and make a relation between the quaternion linear canonical transform and the quaternion linear canonical S-transform.</p><p>The structure of this work is organized as follows. In Section  <xref ref-type="sec" rid="a30f6ce6-9644-f455-a2e5-748e4dd63e18">2</xref>, some basic facts regarding quaternion algebra are collected. The definition of the quaternion Fourier transform (QFT) and useful properties are provided in Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="5b0680b8-6c85-e803-06d1-61cd543ab73a">3</xref>. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="050aa25a-b606-bc05-a920-0b1b75c1b03f">4</xref> briefly reviews the definition of the quaternion linear canonical transform (QLCT) and its connection with the quaternion Fourier transform (QFT). Lastly, Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="eeb25488-9733-ae2f-2f4e-82db9bf437e6">5</xref> contains the introduction of the quaternion linear canonical S-transform (QLCST) and the derivation of Lieb and Nazarov inequalities related to the proposed transformation.</p></sec><sec id="sec-2"><title>2. Quaternion Algebra</title><p>Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ℍ \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> be the associated algebra of real quaternion. The quaternion <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-2"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p ∈ ℍ \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is represented as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">[14]</xref></p><disp-formula id="equation-1"><tex-math id="math-3"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbb {H} = \left\{p = p _ {0} + \mathbf {i} p _ {1} + \mathbf {j} p _ {2} + \mathbf {k} p _ {3} \mid p _ {0}, p _ {1}, p _ {2}, p _ {3} \in \mathbb {R} \right\},\tag{1} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where the three diferent imaginary quaternion units <bold>i</bold>, <bold>j</bold> and <bold>k</bold> follow the multiplication rules:</p><disp-formula id="equation-2"><tex-math id="math-4"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathbf {i j} = - \mathbf {j i} = \mathbf {k}, \quad \mathbf {j k} = - \mathbf {k j} = \mathbf {i}, \quad \mathbf {k i} = - \mathbf {i k} = \mathbf {j}, \quad \mathbf {i} ^ {2} = \mathbf {j} ^ {2} = \mathbf {k} ^ {2} = \mathbf {i j k} = - 1.\tag{2} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Relation (2) shows that quaternion multiplication is not commutative. For every <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-5"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p \in \mathbb { H } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ,</p><disp-formula id="equation-3"><tex-math id="math-6"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p = p _ {0} + \boldsymbol {p} = S c (p) + V (p),\tag{3} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-7"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle S c ( p ) = p _ { 0 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-8"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle V ( p ) = p = { \bf i } p _ { 1 } + { \bf j } p _ { 2 } + { \bf k } p _ { 3 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denote the scalar component and vector component, respectively.</p><p>The conjugate of quaternion <italic>¯p</italic> is defined as</p><disp-formula id="equation-4"><tex-math id="math-9"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \bar {p} = p _ {0} - \mathbf {i} p _ {1} - \mathbf {j} p _ {2} - \mathbf {k} p _ {3}.\tag{4} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>It satisfies the property</p><disp-formula id="equation-5"><tex-math id="math-10"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \overline {{r p}} = \bar {p} \bar {r}, \quad \forall r, p \in \mathbb {H}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The scalar and vector parts of a quaternion <italic>p</italic> are</p><disp-formula id="equation-6"><tex-math id="math-11"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle S c (p) = \frac {1}{2} (p + \bar {p}) \quad \text { and } \quad V (p) = \frac {1}{2} (p - \bar {p}).\tag{5} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The modulus of a quaternion <italic>p</italic> is defined by</p><disp-formula id="equation-7"><tex-math id="math-12"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | p | = \sqrt {p \bar {p}} = \sqrt {p _ {0} ^ {2} + p _ {1} ^ {2} + p _ {2} ^ {2} + p _ {3} ^ {2}}.\tag{6} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>It is straightforward to verify that, for every  <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-13"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle r , t , p \in \mathbb { H } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , the followings hold:</p><disp-formula id="equation-8"><tex-math id="math-14"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle S c (p) \leq | p |, \quad | \boldsymbol {p} | = | \mathrm{V} (p) | \leq | p |, \quad \text { and } \quad S c (r p t) = S c (r t p) = S c (p r t).\tag{7} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The inner product for two quaternion functions  <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-15"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f,g:\mathbb{R}^{2}\longrightarrow\mathbb{H} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is defined by</p><disp-formula id="equation-9"><tex-math id="math-16"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle (f, g) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} f (\pmb {x}) \overline {{g (\pmb {x})}} d \pmb {x}, \quad d \pmb {x} = d x _ {1} d x _ {2},\tag{8} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>with symmetric scalar product</p><disp-formula id="equation-10"><tex-math id="math-17"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \langle f, g \rangle = S c (f, g) = \frac {1}{2} [ (f, g) + (g, f) ].\tag{9} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>For <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-18"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f = g \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in relation <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-4">(9)</xref>, we get <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-19"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> norm, i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="equation-11"><tex-math id="math-20"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \| f \| _ {L ^ {2} \left(\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H}\right)} = \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} | f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x}\right) ^ {1 / 2}.\tag{10} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula></sec><sec id="sec-3"><title>3. Two-Sided Quaternion Fourier Transform</title><p>This part recalls the definition of two-sided quaternion Fourier transform <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-21"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ( \mathrm { Q F T } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We list properties which will be needed in the next section. For more information about the QFT and its properties, we refer the reader to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">19</xref>].<target id="anchor-f2a671db-0994-48b2-a9d1-3c491b9a07b0" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Definition 3.1.</bold> Let <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-22"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , the two-sided quaternion Fourier transform of f is defined as</p><disp-formula id="equation-12"><tex-math id="math-23"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal {F} _ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} e ^ {- \mathrm{i} 2 \pi w _ {1} x _ {1}} f (\boldsymbol {x}) e ^ {- \mathrm{j} 2 \pi w _ {2} x _ {2}} d \boldsymbol {x}.\tag{11} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The following shows that the function <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-24"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f ( { \pmb x } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-6">(11)</xref> can be recovered using its QFT.<target id="anchor-ea096112-2d93-4ac4-abf9-24f386155365" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Definition 3.2.</bold><italic>Let f in</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-25"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle L ^ { 1 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>and</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-26"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal { F } _ { H } \{ f \} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-27"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle L ^ { 1 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . <italic>The inversion formula of the quaternion Fourier transform </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-28"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f o r f \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is calculated by</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-13"><tex-math id="math-29"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal {F} _ {H} ^ {- 1} [ \mathcal {F} _ {H} \{f \} ] (\boldsymbol {x}) = f (\boldsymbol {x}) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} e ^ {\mathrm{i} 2 \pi w _ {1} x _ {1}} \mathcal {F} _ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) e ^ {\mathrm{j} 2 \pi w _ {2} x _ {2}} d \boldsymbol {w}.\tag{12} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The next, from relation <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-7">(12)</xref>, one obtains</p><disp-formula id="equation-14"><tex-math id="math-30"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal {F} _ {H} [ \mathcal {F} _ {H} \{f \} ] (\boldsymbol {x}) = f (- \boldsymbol {w}).\tag{13} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula></sec><sec id="sec-4"><title>4. Quaternion Linear Canonical Transform (QLCT)</title><p>In the sequel, we introduce the two-sided quaternion linear canonical transform (shortly QLCT) and its relationship to the quaternion Fourier transform (QFT). For a detailed information on this transformation, the reader may consult to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">[20]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">[21]</xref>.<target id="anchor-08290f0a-e6fd-4fe8-a3c0-a2029fc3d270" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Definition 4.1.</bold><italic>Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-31"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle A _ { 1 } = ( a _ { 1 } , b _ { 1 } , c _ { 1 } , d _ { 1 } ) = { \bigg [ } a _ { 1 } \quad b _ { 1 } { \bigg ] } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-32"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle A _ { 2 } = ( a _ { 2 } , b _ { 2 } , c _ { 2 } , d _ { 2 } ) = \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-33"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left[ { \begin{array} { l l } { a _ { 2 } } & { b _ { 2 } } \\ { c _ { 2 } } & { d _ { 2 } } \end{array} } \right] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>belong to the special linear group</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-34"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle S L ( 2 , \mathbb { R } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . <italic>The QLCT of a suitable function </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-35"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f \in L ^ { 1 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \cap L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>is defined as</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-15"><tex-math id="math-36"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} K _ {A _ {1}} (x _ {1}, w _ {1}) f (\boldsymbol {x}) K _ {A _ {2}} (x _ {2}, w _ {2}) d \boldsymbol {x}, \quad b _ {1} b _ {2} \neq 0,\tag{14} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="equation-16"><tex-math id="math-37"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) = \sqrt {d _ {1}} e ^ {\mathbf {i} \left(\frac {c _ {1} d _ {1}}{2}\right) w _ {1} ^ {2}} f (d _ {1} w _ {1}, d _ {2} w _ {2}) \sqrt {d _ {2}} e ^ {\mathbf {j} \left(\frac {c _ {2} d _ {2}}{2}\right) w _ {2} ^ {2}}, b _ {1} b _ {2} = 0, \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="equation-17"><tex-math id="math-38"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} K _ {A _ {1}} (x _ {1}, w _ {1}) = \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {1}}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} w _ {1} + \frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} \\ K _ {A _ {2}} (x _ {2}, w _ {2}) = \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {2}}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} w _ {2} + \frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)}. \end{array}\tag{15} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>In this research, we always assume the QLCT with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-39"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle b _ { 1 } b _ { 2 } \neq 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . It is obvious that when <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-40"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle A _ { 1 } = A _ { 2 } = ( a _ { i } , b _ { i } , c _ { i } , d _ { i } ) = ( 0 , 1 , - 1 , 0 ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-41"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle i = 1 , 2 , \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , the QLCT <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-8">(14)</xref> changes to QFT</p><disp-formula id="equation-18"><tex-math id="math-42"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{c} \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \frac {e ^ {- \mathbf {i} \frac {\pi}{4}}}{\sqrt {2 \pi}} e ^ {- \mathbf {i} w _ {1} x _ {1}} f (\boldsymbol {x}) e ^ {- \mathbf {j} w _ {2} x _ {2}} \frac {e ^ {- \mathbf {j} \frac {\pi}{4}}}{\sqrt {2 \pi}} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ = \frac {e ^ {- \mathbf {i} \frac {\pi}{4}}}{\sqrt {2 \pi}} \mathcal {F} _ {H} \{f \} \left(\frac {\boldsymbol {w}}{2 \pi}\right) \frac {e ^ {- \mathbf {j} \frac {\pi}{4}}}{\sqrt {2 \pi}}, \end{array}\tag{16} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-43"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal { F } _ { H } \{ f \} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is defined by <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-6">(11)</xref>.<target id="anchor-39721612-42f2-493f-959e-a743b1386a7a" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Definition 4.2.</bold><italic>For any quaternion signal</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-44"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f ~ \in ~ L ^ { 1 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>with</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-45"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal { L } _ { A _ { 1 } , A _ { 2 } } ^ { H } \{ f \} \in \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-46"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle L ^ { \left( \right)} \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , <italic>the inversion of the QLCT is described by</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-19"><tex-math id="math-47"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} f (\boldsymbol {x}) = \left(\mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H}\right) ^ {- 1} \big [ \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} \big ] (\boldsymbol {x}) \\ = \int_ {\mathbb {R}} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {- \frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {1}}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} w _ {1} + \frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) \\ \times \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {- \frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {2}}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} w _ {2} + \frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} d \boldsymbol {w}. \end{array}\tag{17} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>According to the QLCT definition <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-8">(14)</xref>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-20"><tex-math id="math-48"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) \\ = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {1}}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} w _ {1} + \frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} f (\boldsymbol {x}) \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {2}}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} w _ {2} + \frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \frac {e ^ {- \mathrm{i} \frac {\pi}{4}}}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\mathrm{i} \frac {d _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2}} e ^ {- \mathrm{i} \frac {x _ {1} w _ {1}}{b _ {1}}} e ^ {\mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2}} f (\boldsymbol {x}) \frac {e ^ {- \mathrm{j} \frac {\pi}{4}}}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\mathrm{j} \frac {d _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2}} e ^ {- \mathrm{j} \frac {x _ {2} w _ {2}}{b _ {2}}} e ^ {\mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2}} d \boldsymbol {x}. \end{array} \tag {18} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Hence,</p><disp-formula id="equation-21"><tex-math id="math-49"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}} e ^ {\mathbf {i} \frac {\pi}{4}} e ^ {- \mathbf {i} \frac {d _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2}} \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) e ^ {- \mathbf {j} \frac {d _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2}} \sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}} e ^ {\mathbf {j} \frac {\pi}{4}} \\ = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} e ^ {- \mathbf {i} \frac {x _ {1} w _ {1}}{b _ {1}}} e ^ {\mathbf {i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2}} f (\boldsymbol {x}) e ^ {\mathbf {j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2}} e ^ {- \mathbf {j} \frac {x _ {2} w _ {2}}{b _ {2}}} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ = \mathcal {F} _ {H} \{h \} \left(\frac {\boldsymbol {w}}{2 \pi \boldsymbol {b}}\right) \\ = \mathcal {F} _ {H} \{h \} \left(\frac {w _ {1}}{2 \pi b _ {1}}, \frac {w _ {2}}{2 \pi b _ {2}}\right), \end{array}\tag{19} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="equation-22"><tex-math id="math-50"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle h (\boldsymbol {x}) = e ^ {\mathbf {i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2}} f (\boldsymbol {x}) e ^ {\mathbf {j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2}}.\tag{20} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>By equation (19), we can easily derive for every <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-51"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="equation-23"><tex-math id="math-52"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} | f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w},\tag{21} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>which is known as Parseval’s formula for the QLCT.</p></sec><sec id="sec-5"><title>5. Quaternion Linear Canonical S-Transform</title><p>In the sequel, we start with a definition of the quaternion linear canonical S-transform (QLCST). We collect its essential properties, which will be useful for deriving the main results in this research.<target id="anchor-d9249b8c-29f3-463d-b8af-7566f96e9a49" target-type="reference-target"/></p><sec id="sec-6"><title>5.1. Definition.</title><p><bold>Definition 5.1</bold> (QLCST definition). <italic>Let</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-53"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \phi \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>be a non-zero quaternion window function. The</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-54"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle Q L C S T S _ { \phi } ^ { H } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>for function</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-55"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle h \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>with respect to </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-56"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \phi \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> is defined by</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-24"><tex-math id="math-57"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} h (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} K _ {A _ {1}} (x _ {1}, w _ {1}) h (\boldsymbol {x}) \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} K _ {A _ {2}} (x _ {2}, w _ {2}) d \boldsymbol {x}.\tag{22} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><target id="anchor-2976636c-c644-4ffd-8c5a-9745edf2b53b" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Definition 5.2</bold> (QLCST inversion formula). <italic>Let</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-58"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \phi \in { \cal L } ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>be a quaternion window function that satisfies the following</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-25"><tex-math id="math-59"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} | \phi (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {u} = \phi_ {\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}}, \quad 0 < \phi_ {\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}} < \infty .\tag{23} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Then, every quaternion signal <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-60"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle h \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be reconstructed using inversion formula for the QLCST, that is,</p><disp-formula id="equation-26"><tex-math id="math-61"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle h (\boldsymbol {x}) = \frac {1}{\phi_ {\boldsymbol {u} , \boldsymbol {w}}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} h (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x}, \boldsymbol {w}) K _ {A _ {1}} (x _ {1}, w _ {1}) K _ {A _ {2}} (x _ {2}, w _ {2}) d \boldsymbol {u} d \boldsymbol {w}.\tag{24} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>According to the reference <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">[13]</xref>, we have the following facts:</p><disp-formula id="equation-27"><tex-math id="math-62"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} h (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) = \mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H} \left\{h (\boldsymbol {x}) \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} \right\}.\tag{25} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>This implies that</p><disp-formula id="equation-28"><tex-math id="math-63"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle h (\boldsymbol {x}) \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} = \left(\mathcal {L} _ {A _ {1}, A _ {2}} ^ {H}\right) ^ {- 1} \left[ \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} h (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right].\tag{26} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>The following result will be useful for proving Lieb’s inequality related to the QLCST in the next section.<target id="anchor-d7606554-cec0-46a8-bddf-b19beba754e8" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 5.3</bold> (QLCST sharp Hausdorf-Young relation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">[13]</xref>. <italic>Let</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-64"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle r\in[1,2] \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> and</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-65"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s}=1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. <italic>Then for all </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-66"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f\in L^{r}(\mathbb{R}^{2};\mathbb{H}) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic> , we have</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-29"><tex-math id="math-67"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \big | \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \big | ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{s}} \\ \qquad \leq C _ {r} ^ {2} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} (| b _ {1} | | b _ {2} |) ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \big | \phi (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \big | ^ {r} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{r}} \| f \| _ {L ^ {r} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})}, \end{array}\tag{27} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="equation-30"><tex-math id="math-68"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle C _ {r} = \left(r ^ {\frac {1}{r}} s ^ {- \frac {1}{s}}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{2}}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula></sec><sec id="sec-7"><title>5.2. Lieb’s Inequality.</title><p>Below, we utilize the sharp Hausdorf-Young inequality stated in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-d7606554-cec0-46a8-bddf-b19beba754e8">5.3</xref> to derive Lieb’s inequality for the QLCST. We then obtain the following result.<target id="anchor-9e1c7551-bbb5-4310-8b6f-14f2b3600ae8" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 5.4</bold> (QLCST Lieb’s inequality). <italic>For any functions</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-69"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f , \phi \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ) <italic>and</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-70"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle 2 \leq s < \infty . \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , <italic>one gets</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-31"><tex-math id="math-71"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{s}} \leq \left(\frac {2}{s}\right) ^ {\frac {2}{s}} \frac {\pi^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1}}{s ^ {\frac {2}{s}}} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \| f \| _ {L ^ {2} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})} \| \phi \| _ {L ^ {2} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})}. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>Proof</italic>. From equation (72) in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">[13]</xref>, it is easily seen that</p><disp-formula id="equation-32"><tex-math id="math-72"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{c} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} \bigg) ^ {\frac {1}{s}} \leq C _ {r} ^ {2} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} (| b _ {1} | | b _ {2} |) ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} \right| ^ {r} d \boldsymbol {x} \bigg) ^ {\frac {1}{r}} \\ = C _ {r} ^ {2} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} (| b _ {1} | | b _ {2} |) ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \bigg (\left(| f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r} * \left| \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {r}\right) (\boldsymbol {u}) \bigg) ^ {\frac {1}{r}}, \end{array}\tag{28} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-73"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \phi _ { w } ( { \pmb x } ) = \overline { { \phi ( { \pmb x } , { \pmb w } ) } } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Here, the convolution operator for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-74"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f , g \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by</p><disp-formula id="equation-33"><tex-math id="math-75"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle (f * g) (\boldsymbol {x}) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} f (\boldsymbol {y}) g (\boldsymbol {x} - \boldsymbol {y}) d \boldsymbol {y}.\tag{29} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Writing relation (28) above as</p><disp-formula id="equation-34"><tex-math id="math-76"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} \leq C _ {r} ^ {2 s} \left(\left(2 \pi\right) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} \left(\left| b _ {1} \right| \left| b _ {2} \right|\right) ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}}\right) ^ {s} \left(\left(\left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {r} * \left| \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {r}\right) (\boldsymbol {u})\right) ^ {\frac {s}{r}}.\tag{30} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Integrating both sides of relation <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-14">(30)</xref> with respect to the measure <italic>du</italic> we immediately obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-35"><tex-math id="math-77"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u} \leq C _ {r} ^ {2 s} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} (| b _ {1} | | b _ {2} |) ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \\ \qquad \times \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left(| f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r} * \left| \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {r}\right) (\boldsymbol {u}) d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {s}{r}}. \end{array}\tag{31} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="equation-36"><tex-math id="math-78"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{s}} \\ \leq C _ {r} ^ {2} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left(\left(| f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r} * \left| \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {r}\right) (\boldsymbol {u})\right) ^ {\frac {s}{r}} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{s}} \\ = C _ {r} ^ {2} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left(\left(| f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r} * \left| \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol x) \right| ^ {r}\right) (\boldsymbol {u})\right) ^ {\frac {s}{r}} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{\frac {s}{r}}, \frac {1}{r}} \\ = C _ {r} ^ {2} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \left(\left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left(\left(| f (\boldsymbol x) | ^ {r} * \left| \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol x) \right| ^ {r}\right) (\boldsymbol u)\right) ^ {\frac {s}{r}} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{\frac {s}{r}}}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{r}} \\ = C _ {r} ^ {2} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \| (| f (\boldsymbol x) | ^ {r} * \left| \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol x) \right| ^ {r}) \| _ {L ^ {\frac {s}{r}} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})} ^ {\frac {1}{r}}. \end{array} \tag{32} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-79"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f , \phi \in \ L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> then <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-80"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | f | ^ { r } , | \phi _ { w } | ^ { r } \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and applying Young inequality with <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-81"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array} { r } { ( p , p , t ) = ( \frac { 2 } { r } , \frac { 2 } { r } , \frac { s } { r } ) } \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-82"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \textstyle { \frac { 1 } { p } } + { \frac { 1 } { p } } = { \frac { 1 } { t } } + 1 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , then we get</p><disp-formula id="equation-37"><tex-math id="math-83"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \| (| f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r} * | \phi_ {w} (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r}) \| _ {L ^ {t} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})} \leq C _ {p} ^ {\frac {4}{r}} C _ {t} ^ {\frac {2}{r}} \| | f | ^ {r} \| _ {L ^ {p} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})} ^ {r} \| | \phi | ^ {r} \| _ {L ^ {p} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})} ^ {r}.\tag{33} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Now observe that</p><disp-formula id="equation-38"><tex-math id="math-84"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{aligned}C_r^{2}\, C_p^{\frac{4}{r}}\, C_t^{\frac{2}{r}}&= \left(\frac{r^{\frac{1}{r}}}{s^{\frac{1}{s}}}\right)\left(\frac{p^{\frac{1}{p}}}{p'^{\frac{1}{p'}}}\right)^{\frac{2}{r}}\left(\frac{t'^{\frac{1}{t'}}}{t^{\frac{1}{t}}}\right)^{\frac{1}{r}} \\[4pt]&= \left(\frac{r^{\frac{1}{r}}}{s^{\frac{1}{s}}}\right)\left(\frac{p^{\frac{2}{pr}}}{p'^{\frac{2}{p'r}}}\right)\left(\frac{t'^{\frac{1}{t'r}}}{t^{\frac{1}{tr}}}\right) \\[4pt]&= \left(\frac{r^{\frac{1}{r}}}{s^{\frac{1}{s}}}\right)\left(\frac{p}{p'^{\frac{2}{p'r}}}\right)\left(\frac{t'^{\frac{1}{t'r}}}{\left(\dfrac{s}{r}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}}\right) \\[4pt]&= \left(\frac{r^{\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s}}}{s^{\frac{2}{s}}}\right)\left(\frac{2}{r}\right)\left(\frac{t'^{\frac{1}{t'r}}}{p'^{\frac{2}{p'r}}}\right) \\[4pt]&= \left(\frac{2\,r^{\,\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s}-1}}{s^{\frac{2}{s}}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{s}},\end{aligned}\tag{34} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>where in the fourth inequality, we have chosen <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-85"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle p ^ { \prime } = 2 t ^ { \prime } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> . Hence,</p><disp-formula id="equation-39"><tex-math id="math-86"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle C _ {r} ^ {2} C _ {p} ^ {\frac {4}{r}} C _ {t} ^ {\frac {2}{r}} = \frac {2 ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{r} + 1} r ^ {\frac {1}{r} + \frac {1}{s} - 1}}{s ^ {\frac {2}{s}}} = \frac {2 ^ {\frac {2}{s}}}{s ^ {\frac {2}{s}}} = \left(\frac {2}{s}\right) ^ {\frac {2}{s}}.\tag{35} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Consequently,</p><disp-formula id="equation-40"><tex-math id="math-87"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \big | \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \big | ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{s}} \\ \leq \left(\frac {2}{s}\right) ^ {\frac {2}{s}} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \left(\| | f | ^ {r} \| _ {L ^ {p} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})} \| | \phi | ^ {r} \| _ {L ^ {p} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{r}} \\ \leq \left(\frac {2}{s}\right) ^ {\frac {2}{s}} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \left(\left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left(| f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r}\right) ^ {p} d \boldsymbol {x}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{p}} \times \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left(| \phi (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r}\right) ^ {p} d \boldsymbol {x}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{p}}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{r}} \\ \leq \left(\frac {2}{s}\right) ^ {\frac {2}{s}} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \left(\left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} | f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r \cdot \frac {2}{r}} d \boldsymbol {x}\right) ^ {\frac {r}{2}} \times \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} | \phi (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {r \cdot \frac {2}{r}} d \boldsymbol {x}\right) ^ {\frac {r}{2}}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{r}}. \end{array}\tag{36} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>We finally arrive at</p><disp-formula id="equation-41"><tex-math id="math-88"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \left(\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {s} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u}\right) ^ {\frac {1}{s}} \\ \leq \left(\frac {2}{s}\right) ^ {\frac {2}{s}} (2 \pi) ^ {\frac {2}{s} - 1} | b _ {1} b _ {2} | ^ {\frac {1}{s} - \frac {1}{2}} \| f \| _ {L ^ {2} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})} \| \phi \| _ {L ^ {2} (\mathbb {R} ^ {2}; \mathbb {H})}, \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>which completes the proof.</p><p>Remark 1.</p><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>As far as we know, Lieb inequality for the QLCST in Theorem <xref ref-type="custom" custom-type="reference-target" rid="anchor-9e1c7551-bbb5-4310-8b6f-14f2b3600ae8">5.4</xref> is derived using the sharp-Hausdorf Young inequality, so the proposed Lieb inequality is sharp.</p></list-item></list><list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">[22]</xref>, the future research will explore that Gabor quaternion filter minimizes Lieb inequality involving the QLCST for <inline-formula><tex-math id="math-89"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle s = 2 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p></list-item></list></sec><sec id="sec-8"><title>5.3. Nazarov’s Inequality.</title><p>In the following we establish an analogue of Nazarov’s inequality for the QLCST.<target id="anchor-51f98191-cc86-4ed0-a901-d83e08f822a5" target-type="reference-target"/></p><p><bold>Theorem 5.5.</bold><italic>Let</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-90"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \phi \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>be a non-zero quaternion window function. Let </italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-91"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f \in L ^ { 2 } ( \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } ; \mathbb { H } ) \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula> , <italic>and</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-92"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle A , B \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>be two subsets</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-93"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle o f \mathbb { R } ^ { 2 } \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>with finite measure, then there exists a constant</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-94"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle k > 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>such that:</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-42"><tex-math id="math-95"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \phi_ {\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} | f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ \leq k e ^ {| A | | B |} \bigg (\phi_ {\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus A} | f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} + \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus B b} \big | \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \big | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u} \bigg), \end{array}\tag{37} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p><italic>where</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-96"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | A | \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>and</italic><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-97"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle | B | \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula><italic>denote the Lebesgue measures of A and B.</italic></p><p><italic>Proof</italic>. Based on the Nazarov’s inequality for the two-sided quaternion linear canonical transform, we have</p><disp-formula id="equation-43"><tex-math id="math-98"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} \leq k e ^ {| A | | B |} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus A} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} + \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus B b} \left| \mathcal {L} _ {A} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w} \bigg).\tag{38} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>An application of relation (25) into both sides of identity  <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="equation-17">(38)</xref>, we get</p><disp-formula id="equation-44"><tex-math id="math-99"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \bigg | \big (\mathcal {L} _ {A} ^ {H} \big) ^ {- 1} \big [ \mathcal {L} _ {A} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {x}) \big ] \bigg | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ \leq k e ^ {| A | | B |} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus A} \bigg | \big (\mathcal {L} _ {A} ^ {H} \big) ^ {- 1} \big [ \mathcal {L} _ {A} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {x}) \big ] \bigg | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} + \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus B b} \big | \mathcal {L} _ {A} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w}) \big | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w} \bigg). \end{array}\tag{39} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="equation-45"><tex-math id="math-100"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ \leq k e ^ {| A | | B |} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus A} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} + \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus B b} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w} \bigg). \end{array}\tag{40} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Integrating both sides of equation (40) with respect to <italic>du</italic> we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-46"><tex-math id="math-101"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {2} \overline {{\left| \phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w}) \right|}} ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} d \boldsymbol {u} \\ \leq k e ^ {| A | | B |} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus A} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} d \boldsymbol {u} + \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus B b} \left| \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u} \bigg). \end{array}\tag{41} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Or, equivalently,</p><disp-formula id="equation-47"><tex-math id="math-102"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {2} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {u} \bigg) d \boldsymbol {x} \\ \leq k e ^ {| A | | B |} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus A} \left| f (\boldsymbol {x}) \right| ^ {2} \bigg (\int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \left| \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - \boldsymbol {x} , \boldsymbol {w})}} \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {u} \bigg) d \boldsymbol {x} + \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus B b} \left| S _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \right| ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u} \bigg). \end{array}\tag{42} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Hence,</p><disp-formula id="equation-48"><tex-math id="math-103"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \phi_ {\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} | f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ \qquad \leq k e ^ {| A | | B |} \bigg (\phi_ {\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus A} | f (\boldsymbol {x}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {x} + \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2} \setminus B b} | \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) | ^ {2} d \boldsymbol {w} d \boldsymbol {u} \bigg), \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>which finishes the proof.</p><p>Now let us implement the above properties by providing a simple example.</p><p><bold>Example 1.</bold><italic>Consider the Gaussian functions</italic></p><disp-formula id="equation-49"><tex-math id="math-104"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle f (\pmb {x}) = e ^ {- a | \pmb {x} | ^ {2}}, \quad a > 0 \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="equation-50"><tex-math id="math-105"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \phi (\boldsymbol {x}) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l l} 1,  - 1 \leq x _ {1}, x _ {2} \leq 1 \\ 0,  \text { elsewhere. } \end{array} \right. \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Its quaternion linear canonical S-transform is derived as follows.</p><p>In view of equation (22), we obtain</p><disp-formula id="equation-51"><tex-math id="math-106"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \left\{f \right\} \left(\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}\right) = \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {1}}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} w _ {1} + \frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} e ^ {- a | x | ^ {2}} \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - x , \boldsymbol {w})}} \\ \qquad \times \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {2}}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} w _ {2} + \frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ \qquad = \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} \int_ {\mathbb {R} ^ {2}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {1}}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} w _ {1}\right) - a x _ {1} ^ {2}} \overline {{\phi (\boldsymbol {u} - x , \boldsymbol {w})}} \\ \qquad \times e ^ {- a x _ {2} ^ {2} + \frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {2}}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} w _ {2}\right)} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} d \boldsymbol {x} \\ \qquad = \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \pi / 2\right)} \int_ {u _ {1} - 1} ^ {u _ {1} + 1} e ^ {- a x _ {1} ^ {2} + \frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {1}}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {1}} x _ {1} w _ {1}\right)} d x _ {1} \\ \qquad \times \int_ {u _ {2} - 1} ^ {u _ {2} + 1} e ^ {- a x _ {2} ^ {2} + \frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {a _ {2}}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {2}{b _ {2}} x _ {2} w _ {2}\right)} d x _ {2} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)}. \end{array}\tag{43} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Further we get</p><disp-formula id="equation-52"><tex-math id="math-107"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{r l} & {\mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w})} \\ & {= \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} \int_ {u _ {1} - 1} ^ {u _ {1} + 1} e ^ {- \left(a - \frac {\mathrm{i} a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right) x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\mathrm{i} x _ {1} w _ {1}}{b _ {1}}} d x _ {1}} \\ & {\quad \times \int_ {u _ {2} - 1} ^ {u _ {2} + 1} e ^ {- \left(a - \frac {\mathrm{j} a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right) x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\mathrm{j} x _ {2} w _ {2}}{b _ {2}}} d x _ {2} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)}} \\ & {= \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)} \int_ {u _ {1} - 1} ^ {u _ {1} + 1} e ^ {- \left(a - \frac {{\mathrm{i}} a _ {1}}{{2 b _ {1}}}\right) \left(x _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {{\mathrm{i}} \frac {w _ {1}}{{b _ {1}}}}{{(a - {\mathrm{i}} \frac {a _ {1}}{{2 b _ {1}}})}} x _ {1}\right)} d x _ {1}} \\ & {\quad \times \int_ {u _ {2} - 1} ^ {u _ {2} + 1} e ^ {- \left(a - \frac {{\mathrm{j}} a _ {2}}{{2 b _ {2}}}\right) \left(x _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {{\mathrm{j}} \frac {w _ {2}}{{b _ {2}}}}{{(a - {\mathrm{j}} \frac {a _ {2}}{{2 b _ {2}}})}} x _ {2}\right)} d x _ {2} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)}} \\ & {= \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} {\left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)}} \int_ {u _ {1} - 1} ^ {u _ {1} + 1} e ^ {- (a - {\mathrm{i}} \frac {a _ {1}}{{2 b _ {1}}}) \left({\left(x _ {1} - \frac {{\mathrm{i}} \frac {w _ {1}}{{b _ {1}}}}{{2 (a - {\mathrm{i}} \frac {a _ {1}}{{b _ {1}}})}}\right) ^ {2}} - \left(\frac {{\mathrm{i}} \frac {w _ {1}}{{b _ {1}}}}{{2 (a - {\mathrm{i}} \frac {a _ {1}}{{2 b _ {1}}})}}\right) ^ {2}\right)} d x _ {1}} \\ & {\quad \times \int_ {u _ {2} - 1} ^ {u _ {2} + 1} e ^ {- (a - {\mathrm{j}} \frac {a _ {2}}{{2 b _ {2}}}) \left({\left(x _ {2} - \frac {{\mathrm{j}} \frac {w _ {2}}{{b _ {2}}}}{{2 (a - {\mathrm{j}} \frac {a _ {2}}{{b _ {2}}})}}\right) ^ {2}} - \left(\frac {{\mathrm{j}} \frac {w _ {2}}{{b _ {2}}}}{{2 (a - {\mathrm{j}} \frac {a _ {2}}{{2 b _ {2}}})}}\right) ^ {2}\right)} d x _ {2} \frac 1{\sqrt 2 \pi b _ {2}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} {\left(\frac d{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right)}}.} \end{array}\tag{44} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="equation-53"><tex-math id="math-108"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{r l} & {\mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {w})} \\ & {= \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right) - \frac {\left(\frac {w _ {1}}{b _ {1}}\right) ^ {2}}{4 \left(a - \mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right)}} \int_ {u _ {1} - 1} ^ {u _ {1} + 1} e ^ {- \left(a - \mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right) \left(x _ {1} - \frac {\mathrm{i} \frac {w _ {1}}{b _ {1}}}{2 \left(a - \mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{b _ {1}}\right)}\right) ^ {2}} d x _ {1}} \\ & {\quad \times \int_ {u _ {2} - 1} ^ {u _ {2} + 1} e ^ {- \left(a - \mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right) \left(x _ {2} - \frac {\mathrm{j} \frac {w _ {2}}{b _ {2}}}{2 (a - \mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{b _ {2}})}\right) ^ {2}} d x _ {2} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right) - \frac {\left(\frac {w _ {2}}{b _ {2}}\right) ^ {2}}{4 \left(a - \mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right)}}} \\ & {= \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right) - \frac {w _ {1} ^ {2}}{4 b _ {1} \left(a - \mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right)}} \int_ {u _ {1} - 1} ^ {u _ {1} + 1} e ^ {- \left(\sqrt {a - \mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}} \left(x _ {1} - \mathrm{i} \frac {w _ {1}}{2 b _ {1} \left(a - \mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right)}\right)\right) ^ {2}} d x _ {1}} \\ & {\quad \times \int_ {u _ {2} - 1} ^ {u _ {2} + 1} e ^ {- \left(\sqrt {a - \mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}} \left(x _ {2} - \mathrm{j} \frac {w _ {2}}{2 b _ {2} \left(a - \mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right)}\right)\right) ^ {2}} d x _ {2} \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right) - \frac {w _ {2} ^ {2}}{4 b _ {2} \left(a - \mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right)}}.} \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula><p>This equation simplifies to</p><disp-formula id="equation-54"><tex-math id="math-109"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle \begin{array}{l} \mathcal {S} _ {\phi} ^ {H} \{f \} (\boldsymbol {u}, \boldsymbol {w}) \\ = \frac {1}{4 \sqrt {2 \pi b _ {1} - \mathbf {i} a _ {1}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{i}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {1}}{b _ {1}} w _ {1} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right) - \frac {w _ {1} ^ {2}}{4 b _ {1} \left(a - \mathrm{i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right)}} \\ \times (\operatorname{erf} \left(\sqrt {a - \mathbf {i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}} \left(u _ {1} + 1 - \mathbf {i} \frac {w _ {1}}{2 b _ {1} \left(a - \mathbf {i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right)}\right)\right) \\ - \operatorname{erf} \left(\sqrt {a - \mathbf {i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}} \left(u _ {1} - 1 - \mathbf {i} \frac {w _ {1}}{2 b _ {1} \left(a - \mathbf {i} \frac {a _ {1}}{2 b _ {1}}\right)}\right)\right) \\ \times \operatorname{erf} \left(\sqrt {a - \mathbf {j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}} \left(u _ {2} + 1 - \mathbf {j} \frac {w _ {2}}{2 b _ {2} \left(a - \mathbf {j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right)}\right)\right) - \\ \operatorname{erf} \left(\sqrt {a - \mathbf {j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}} \left(u _ {2} - 1 - \mathbf {j} \frac {w _ {2}}{2 b _ {2} \left(a - \mathbf {j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right)}\right)\right) \frac {1}{\sqrt {2 \pi b _ {2} - \mathbf {j} a _ {2}}} e ^ {\frac {\mathrm{j}}{2} \left(\frac {d _ {2}}{b _ {2}} w _ {2} ^ {2} - \frac {\pi}{2}\right) - \frac {w _ {2} ^ {2}}{4 b _ {2} \left(a - \mathrm{j} \frac {a _ {2}}{2 b _ {2}}\right)}}. \end{array} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></disp-formula></sec></sec></body><back><ack><title>Acknowledgement.</title><p>The research was partially supported by the TRG scheme 2025 (02074/UN4.1/KEP/2025) of Hasanuddin University, Indonesia. The authors are very grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.</p></ack><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Linear canonical wavelet transform in quaternion domains</article-title><source>Advances in Applied Cliford Algebras</source><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Teali</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tantary</surname><given-names>A.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>42,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00006-021-01142-7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>On two-dimensional quaternion wigner-ville distribution</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Mathematics</source><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bahri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><page-range>139471,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2014/139471</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Relation between quaternion fourier transform and quaternion wigner-ville distribution associated with linear canonical transform</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Mathematics</source><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bahri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fatimah</surname><given-names>M.Saleh Arif</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>3247364,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2017/3247364</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>On a new wigner-ville distribution associated with linear canonical transform</article-title><source>EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing</source><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xin</surname><given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.-Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>56,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13634-021-00753-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Linear canonical wigner distribution and its application</article-title><source>Optik</source><volume>125</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><page-range>89-92,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.07.007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Quaternionic shearlet transform</article-title><source>Optik</source><volume>175</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tantary</surname><given-names>A.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>115-125,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.08.135</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Uncertainty principle for the two-sided quaternion windowed fourier transform</article-title><source>Integral Transforms and Special Functions</source><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kamel</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tefjeni</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>362-382,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10652469.2019.1572138</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Linear canonical stockwell transform</article-title><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><volume>484</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tantary</surname><given-names>A.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>123673,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123673</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A generalized s-transform in linear canonical transform</article-title><source>Journal of Physics: Conference Series</source><volume>1341</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bahri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toaha</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lande</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>062005,</page-range><publisher-name>IOP Publishing</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1742-6596/1341/6/062005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="conf-paper"><article-title>The linear canonical transform and its application to timefrequency signal analysis</article-title><source>2009 International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>K.-Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><page-range>1-4,</page-range><publisher-name>IEEE</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ICIECS.2009.5365117</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Multiresolution analysis for linear canonical s transform</article-title><source>Advances in Operator Theory</source><volume>6</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>M.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dar</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>1-11,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s43036-021-00164-z</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Quaternion linear canonical s-transform and associated uncertainty principles</article-title><source>International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing</source><volume>21</volume><issue>01</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>M.Younus</given-names></name><name><surname>Dar</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>2250035,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1142/S0219691322500357</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Novel uncertainty principles related to quaternion linear canonical s-transform</article-title><source>Symmetry</source><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Damang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bahri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toaha</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>885,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/sym16070885</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="thesis"><article-title>Hypercomplex spectral signal representations for the processing and analysis of images</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. B ̈ulow</string-name></person-group><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Pitt’s inequality and the uncertainty principle associated with the quaternion fourier transform</article-title><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><volume>423</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L.-P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kou</surname><given-names>K.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>M.-S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><page-range>681-700,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.10.003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Quaternion fourier transform on quaternion fields and generalizations</article-title><source>Advances in Applied Cliford Algebras</source><volume>17</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hitzer</surname><given-names>E.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><page-range>497-517,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00006-007-0037-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Uncertainty principle for the quaternion fourier transform</article-title><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><volume>467</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lian</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>1258-1269,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.08.002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Sharp hausdorf-young inequalities for the quaternion fourier transforms</article-title><source>Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society</source><volume>148</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lian</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>697-703,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1090/proc/14735</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Titchmarsh’s-type theorem for two-sided quaternion fourier transform and sharp hausdorf–young inequality for quaternion linear canonical transform</article-title><source>Examples and Counterexamples</source><volume>6</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bahri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>100154,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.exco.2024.100154</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Uncertainty principles for the quaternion linear canonical transform</article-title><source>Advances in Applied Cliford Algebras</source><volume>29</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Achak</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abouelaz</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Daher</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Safouane</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><page-range>1-19,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00006-019-1020-x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Novel uncertainty principles for two-sided quaternion linear canonical transform</article-title><source>Advances in Applied Cliford Algebras</source><volume>28</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.-N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.-Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><page-range>1-14,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00006-018-0828-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Ofset quaternion linear canonical transform: Properties, uncertainty inequalities and application</article-title><source>Journal of the Franklin Institute</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bahri</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tahir</surname><given-names>N.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bachtiar</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zakir</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>107553,</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jfranklin.2025.107553</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>